Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gulf of Maine, United States |
Dredge
|
Scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) |
Excluder devices
|
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Chelonia mydas (Green sea turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) | Field study in the wild | A chain mat placed on Northwest Atlantic dredge gear eliminated bycatch of sea turtles: loggerhead (Caretta caretta), leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea), and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). The chain mat reduced catch by 6.71%. |
Florida, United States |
Hooks and Lines
|
King mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) |
Quick-release gear
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | Preliminary tests of a quick-release metal wire added to the king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) troll fishery in Florida (United States) reduced depredation of catch by bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). There was no impact on king mackerel catch. |
N/A |
Trawls
|
N/A |
Excluder devices
|
Pinnipeds, Arctocephalus forsteri (New Zealand fur seal, kekeno), Phocarctos hookeri (New Zealand sea lion, pakake, whakahao) | Study in the lab | An excluder device, tested on a trawl net in a flume tank with dummy seals in New Zealand excluded dummy seals from the codend of the net. The modifications were trialed to address bycatch of Hooker's sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri) and New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri). Excluded experimental dummy seals |
United Kingdom |
Trawls
|
Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) |
Excluder devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin) | Field study in the wild | An excluder device, tested in the United Kingdom bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), pair trawl fishery, reduced bycatch of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). There was a negligible loss of target fish (<1%). |
Hawaii, United States |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish and tuna |
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
|
Seabirds, Phoebastria immutabilis (Laysan albatross), Phoebastria nigripes (Black-footed albatross), Puffinus tenuirostris (Short-tailed shearwater) | Field study in the wild | Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross (Phoebastria immutabilis and Phoebastria nigripes) and short-tailed shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris) in the Hawaiian (U.S.) longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy. |
Hawaii, United States |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish and tuna |
Dyed bait
|
Seabirds, Phoebastria immutabilis (Laysan albatross), Phoebastria nigripes (Black-footed albatross), Puffinus tenuirostris (Short-tailed shearwater) | Field study in the wild | Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross (Phoebastria immutabilis and Phoebastria nigripes) and short-tailed shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris) in the Hawaiian (U.S.) longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy. Reduced bycatch but least effective of 3 tested techniques |
Hawaii, United States |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish and tuna |
Side sets
|
Seabirds, Phoebastria immutabilis (Laysan albatross), Phoebastria nigripes (Black-footed albatross), Puffinus tenuirostris (Short-tailed shearwater) | Field study in the wild | Underwater setting chutes, blue-dyed bait, and side-sets each reduced the bycatch of seabirds (Laysan and black-footed albatross (Phoebastria immutabilis and Phoebastria nigripes) and short-tailed shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris) in the Hawaiian (U.S.) longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Side-sets showed the most promise for a bycatch mitigation technique while blue-dyed bait was the least effective at reducing seabird bycatch and shows the least promise of these methods as an effective bycatch mitigation strategy. Reduced bycatch; most promising of 3 tested techniques |
Gulf of Mexico, United States |
Trawls
|
Shrimp |
Excluder devices
|
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) | Field study in the wild | Turtle excluder devices (TEDs) reduce sea turtle and non-target finfish (Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulateus), spot (Leiostomus exanthurus), sea catfish (Arius felis), and weakfish (Cynoscion regalis)) bycatch in the Gulf of Mexico prawn trawl fishery. Catch of targeted shrimp varied by location and TED configuration, but there was no significant difference in shrimp catch rates in 3 of the 4 TEDs when compared with a control net. One experimental TED in Texas (United States) exhibited a decrease in shrimp catch. |
Washington, United States |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Salmon |
Acoustic deterrent devices
Visual deterrents
|
Seabirds, Cerorhinca monocerata (Rhinoceros auklet), Uria aalge (Common murre) | Field study in the wild | Acoustic pingers reduced the bycatch of the common murre (Uria aalge) in the Puget Sound (United States) salmon drift gillnet fishery, but they did not reduce bycatch of the rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). Reduction of target species catch was not significant. White gillnet mesh panels in the upper portion of the net reduce the bycatch of seabirds (common murres and rhinoceros auklet) in the Puget Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery. Rhinoceros auklet bycatch was only reduced in 50-mesh visual alert nets. The white mesh panels decreased salmon catch in 50-mesh but not in 20-mesh. Variable depending on seabird species |
Washington, United States |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Salmon |
Acoustic deterrent devices
Visual deterrents
|
Seabirds, Cerorhinca monocerata (Rhinoceros auklet), Uria aalge (Common murre) | Field study in the wild | Acoustic pingers reduced the bycatch of the common murre (Uria aalge) in the Puget Sound (United States) salmon drift gillnet fishery, but they did not reduce bycatch of the rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). Reduction of target species catch was not significant. White gillnet mesh panels in the upper portion of the net reduce the bycatch of seabirds (common murres and rhinoceros auklet) in the Puget Sound salmon drift gillnet fishery. Rhinoceros auklet bycatch was only reduced in 50-mesh visual alert nets. The white mesh panels decreased salmon catch in 50-mesh but not in 20-mesh. Reduced bycatch but results varied by mesh size |