Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 761 - 767 of 767
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Atlantic Canada

N/A Sea Turtles, Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Summary study
Summary:

This study assessed the interaction of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) with fixed-gear fisheries in high-latitude seasonal foraging habitat (Atlantic Canada), using sightings data from 1998-2014. Most reports came from coastal Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, with reports peaking in the mid-to-late 2000s. The majority of reported entanglements came during the summer months (July and August), and were with pot gear and trap nets. 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Hamelin, K.M., James, M.C., Ledwell, W., Huntington, J. and Martin, K, 2017 , Incidental capture of leatherback sea turtles in fixed fishing gear off Atlantic Canada

Alaska, US West Coast

Trawls
Gadus chalcogrammus, Merluccius productus
Excluder devices
Bony Fishes, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) allow selective release of unwanted fish (bycatch) during fishing operations, while retaining target fish. Existing BRDs use passive methods, exploiting differences in fish behavior, size, and/or shape to separate bycatch from target species. Recent availability of practical systems transmitting real-time video from trawls to the towing vessel during routine fishing opens the possibility to develop active selection (ActSel) BRDs, devices that allow trawlers to selectively trigger fish release when bycatch species are observed.
Development through numerical modeling, scale-model tests, and full-scale, at-sea trials, resulted in an ActSel BRD system that, when triggered, quickly (average 10 s) and reversibly moved a mesh panel between configurations covering a release opening or leading fish out of that opening. A hydrodynamic kite across that selection panel’s leading edge drove it between catch and release positions. Manipulation of control lines by a remotely-controlled electromechanical reel adjusted the kite’s orientation, determining movements of the mesh panel. Results of full-scale testing of this ActSel system under commercial fishing conditions while trawling for Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) showed that ActSel operation effectively and reversibly changed movement of all fish from normal passage toward the codend to moving toward the release opening. While our sea trials occurred in the Pacific hake fishery, the ActSel has applications to other trawl fisheries, particularly fisheries where real-time video systems are used (i.e., Alaska pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) fishery).

Effect on Bycatch: Release
Reference:
Rose, C.S. and D. Barbee, 2022 , Developing and testing a novel active-selection (ActSel) bycatch reduction device to quickly alternate trawls between capture and release configurations with real-time triggering

China

Hooks and Lines
Tuna (various)
Bird-scaring devices
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study examined the effects of different tail-section towing configurations on tori line aerial-extent performance using at-sea trials on Chinese tuna-fishing vessels. Three tori line configurations were evaluated at representative operational vessel speeds of 4.5, 6.0, and 8.2 kt. These included the baseline streamer configuration, a plastic-cone configuration (20 m long drag section with four 45 cm plastic cones installed at intervals of 2 m), and a drogue configuration (20 m long drag section with 50 cm drogue at terminal end, followed by 10 m of resin rope and a 200 mm float). A sensitivity analysis was also conducted using low-, moderate-, and high-drag scenarios, and the drag force generated by each configuration was estimated. The results showed that tail-section towing configuration clearly affected the aerial deployment of the tori line. The drogue configuration achieved the best aerial-extent performance at all tested vessel speeds, and met or exceeded the 100 m benchmark under all test conditions. The baseline streamer configuration ranked second. These findings indicate that both the magnitude and stability of the drag generated by the tail-section towing configuration are important factors influencing tori line aerial-extent performance.

Effect on Bycatch: Not tested
Reference:
Tangwei, Yang Hailang, Pan Boyi, Wufeng Guqbio, Lin Qinquin, Geng Zhe, Tang Hao, Zhu Jianfeng, and Wang Xuefang, 2026 , Optimizing tori line performance through terminal towing configurations in tuna longline fisheries

China

N/A Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Skates/Rays, Mammals, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pinnipeds, Seabirds, Sea Turtles, Bony Fishes, Invertebrates Summary study
Summary:

A cumulative impact analysis framework integrating species habitat suitability and fishing effort data, stratified by gear type, was used to assess bycatch risk for threatened and protected species in China's seas and adjacent waters. Across all taxonomic groups examined, including seabirds, sea turtles, marine mammals, elasmobranchs, bony fishes, and benthic invertebrates, the highest bycatch risk was concentrated between 23°N and 25°N. For marine mammals and sea turtles, elevated risk was concentrated along China's southeastern coast, extending through inshore waters from the Yangtze River Estuary south to 20°N, with trawls and gillnets contributing most significantly to risk. Seabird bycatch hotspots were primarily located around islands, bays, and estuaries north of 20°N, where gillnets posed the greatest threat. Elasmobranchs experienced high bycatch risk from the Taiwan Strait to the Yangtze River Estuary and around Jeju Island, and were the most vulnerable taxa group overall. Bycatch risk for benthic invertebrates was largely restricted to narrow nearshore areas and was associated primarily with dredging activities. The study also found that marine protected areas generally exhibited lower bycatch risk than surrounding waters.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Jiang, N., Huang, Qiqi, Jiang, Zhijian, and Xu, Weihua , 2026 , Bycatch risk of threatened and protected marine species in China's seas and adjacent waters

N/A

N/A
Visual deterrents
Summary study
Summary:

A structured narrative review of the impact of artificial light on catch performance was conducted using peer-reviewed literature published mainly during 2016–2025, emphasizing field experiments and physiological studies relevant to light-assisted capture. Blue, cyan, and green wavelengths frequently produced strong behavioral or catch responses because they propagate efficiently in seawater and overlap with the visual sensitivity of many marine organisms. However, outcomes were strongly dependent on species, fishing gear, irradiance, depth, water optical properties, and operational context. Light may also indirectly influence catch by attracting prey organisms or altering bycatch interactions. 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Rosyid, M.A. and Prayogo, L.M., 2026 , Artificial Light Color and Fish Catch Performance in Marine Fisheries: A Review

Eastern Pacific Ocean

Hooks and Lines
Primarily tuna and swordfish (various sp.) Seabirds, Diomedea antipodensis (Antipodean albatross), Phoebastria irrorata (Waved albatross), Procellaria aequinoctialis (White-chinned petrel), Procellaria parkinsoni (Black petrel), Thalassarche bulleri (Buller's albatross), Thalassarche eremita (Chatham albatross), Thalassarche salvini (Salvin's albatross) Summary study
Summary:

This study quantified spatial overlap between seabirds and industrial and small-scale coastal longline fisheries in the eastern Pacific Ocean, as well as overlap between seabird utilization distributions and areas where seabird bycatch mitigation is mandated by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC). Species with the highest overlap with fisheries, a proxy for bycatch risk, included non-breeding adult black (Procellaria parkinsoni) and white-chinned petrels (P. aequinoctialis), Chatham (Thalassarche eremita), Buller’s (T. bulleri), Antipodean (Diomedea antipodensis antipodensis), and Salvin’s (T. salvini) albatrosses, and breeding waved albatrosses (Phoebastria irrorata). The IATTC mitigation area appeared to encompass most core habitat in the eastern Pacific for the seabird species considered, with the notable exception of foraging black petrels, which largely occurred outside this area. 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Crear, D.P., Clay, T.A., Carneiro, A.P., Fischer, J.H., Debski, I., Anderson, D.J., Awkerman, J.A., Baylis, A.M., Bell, E.A., Campioni, L. and Catry, P, 2026 , Albatross and petrel overlap with pelagic longline fisheries in the Eastern Pacific Ocean

Sweden

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A Mammals, Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Summary study
Summary:

This study investigated spatiotemporal patterns in harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch rates in the Swedish gillnet fishery, including a first assessment of harbor porpoise bycatch along the Swedish south coast. Bycatch rates were higher along the southern than the western coast. Further, porpoise bycatch in the south likely is from the endangered Belt Sea subpopulation, rather than the critically endangered Baltic Sea subpopulation. The estimates also indicate a declining trend in the number of bycaught individuals, likely reflecting reduced gillnet fishing effort over time.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Säterberg, T., Königson, S., Persson, A.S., Pärn, H., Ringdahl, K. and Nyberg, S., 2026 , Spatiotemporal patterns in harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch in the Swedish gillnet fishery

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Current page 77

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in