Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 491 - 500 of 767
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Cyprus, Eastern Mediterranean

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Teleost fishes
Visual deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Skates/Rays, Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Chelonia mydas (Green sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Illuminated nets were tested to evaluate their effect on catch and bycatch in set nets, principally green (Chelonia mydas) and loggerhead (Careta caretta) sea turtles, in northern Cyprus. Reductions in the catch of sea turtle and non-target sharks and rays were recorded with no effect on target catch. Data were collected from 130 field sets that occurred over a two-year period. Experimental effort should be expanded to better ascertain the relationship between the illuminated devices used and sea turtle bycatch reduction.

Effect on Bycatch: 42% reduction in sea turtle bycatch; 50% reduction in skate and ray bycatch
Reference:
Snape, R.T.E., Beton, D., Broderick, A.C., Omeyer, L.C.M., and Godley, B.J, 2024 , Flashing NetLights reduce bycatch in small-scale fisheries of the Eastern Mediterranean

Field study in the wild
Summary:

Illuminated nets were tested to evaluate their effect on catch and bycatch in set nets, principally green (Chelonia mydas) and loggerhead (Careta caretta) sea turtles, in northern Cyprus. Reductions in the catch of sea turtle and non-target sharks and rays were recorded with no effect on target catch. Data were collected from 130 field sets that occurred over a two-year period. Experimental effort should be expanded to better ascertain the relationship between the illuminated devices used and sea turtle bycatch reduction.

Reference:
Snape, R.T.E., Beton, D., Broderick, A.C., Omeyer, L.C.M., and Godley, B.J, 2024 , Flashing NetLights reduce bycatch in small-scale fisheries of the Eastern Mediterranean

Argentina

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Sciaenids (Cynoscion guatucupa and Micropogonias furnieri Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Two dolphin click detectors (F-PODs) were placed in two artisanal gillnets in Claromecó (Buenos Aires province, Argentina). Narrowband high-frequency (NBHF) clicks were found near both gillnets, compatible with the description of the franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) sound production. These preliminary results confirm that passive acoustic monitoring is a good tool to assess franciscana presence.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Gisela V. Giardino, Mel Cosentino, Giuseppa Buscaino, Ricardo Bastida, and Diego Rodríguez, 2023 , Acoustic Detection of Franciscana Dolphins Near Artisanal Fishing Nets in Argentina

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

 This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the acoustic capabilities of the franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei). The authors examined the detailed acoustic signals of franciscana dolphins, and compared the sounds from rehabilitated dolphins in captivity with those of wild dolphins near fishing nets. Significant differences in acoustic characteristics were found between neonates and older dolphins, with juvenile and wild dolphins showing similar features. For the first time, repetition patterns in click production were identified, highlighting the importance of understanding the context of these sounds in regards to feeding and communication. This study emphasizes the need for detecting neonates for species protection and suggests the potential for developing acoustic classifiers specific to different age groups. 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Gisela Vanina Giardino, Mel Cosentino, Agustina Camila Macchi, Juan Pablo Loureiro, Sergio Rodriguez Heredia, Karina Ceilia Alvarez, Sergio Gabriel Moron and Diego Horacio Rodriguez, 2024 , Detailed Comparison of Acoustic Signals from Rehabilitated and Wild Franciscanas (Pontoporia blainvillei) Dolphins

Western Baltic Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Passive acoustic deterrents
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Pearl Nets, a passive acoustic deterrent, were tested in commercial gillnet fisheries in the Western Baltic Sea. Compared to a control, the Peal Nets reduced harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch and maintained target catch rate for Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Effect on Bycatch: Prevented bycatch
Reference:
Kindt-Larsen, L., Noack, T., Books, M.E., Kroner, A.M., and Glemarec, G. , 2024 , Pearls are not just for girls: Plastic spheres do not interfere with target catches in a set net fishery

Western Australia

Western rock lobster, octopus
Acoustic deterrent devices

Visual deterrents

Weak links/ropes
Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Megaptera novaeangliae (Humpback whale) Summary study
Summary:

Surveys and data sources were used to investigate overlap of migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and both the Western Rock Lobster Fisheries and Developmental Octopus Fisheries off the coast of Western Australia, and to investigate gear modifications to mitigate entanglement. Modifications were made to float rigs (rope type, rope length, and number of floats used), but effectiveness was not assessed within this project. Preliminary results showed that whales are more likely to become entangled in ropes that are thinner, mainlines that are yellow or orange, and orange header rigs. Acoustic pingers were also trialed, but demonstrated no impact on humpback whale behavior; however, the results were inconclusive due to environmental conditions.

Effect on Bycatch: Modifications to rope girth and color may be effective; acoustic pingers showed no effect
Reference:
How, J., Coughran, D., Smith, J., Double, M., Harrison, J., McMath, J., Hebiton, B., Denham, A., 2015 , Effectiveness of mitigation measures to reduce interactions between commercial fishing gear and whales

Amsterdam/St. Paul Islands (Indian Ocean), southeastern Australia

Hooks and Lines
Blue-eye trevalla (Hyperoglyphe antarctica) Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Orcinus orca (Orca whale) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study assessed the frequency and spatio-temporal variation of previously unreported killer whale (Orcinus orca) interactions/depredation with blue-eye trevalla (Hyperoglyphe antarctica) longline fisheries in two geographically isolated populations: one off Amsterdam/St. Paul Islands and another in south-eastern Australia. This two fisheries differ in fishing technique (vertical vs. demersal longlines) and effort. Results from 2010-2016 show that the probability of killer whale interactions in south-eastern Australia decreased in spring and with distance traveled by the vessel between fishing days, but increased with daily fishing effort. In Amsterdam/St. Paul, killer whale interactions increased with latitude. 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: Temporal and latitudinal variations; decreased fishing effort decreases orca interactions
Reference:
Tixier, P., Lea, M.A., Hindell, M., Guinet, C., Gasco, N., Duhamel, G., Arnould, J.P.Y., 2018 , Killer whale (Orcinus orca) interactions with blue-eye trevalla (Hyperoglyphe antarctica) longline fisheries

N/A

N/A Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Eubalaena glacialis (North Atlantic right whale) Summary study
Summary:

This summary study used hierarchical Bayesian modeling to quantify the relationship between entanglement injury/severity with North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) survival, reproduction and population health. Results show that entanglement negatively affects both reproductive and non-reproductive groups, compromises individual health even when gear is not present, reduces survival (especially in females), and reduces fecundity in females that do survive. 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Knowlton, A.R., Clark, J.S., Hamilton, P.K., Kruas, S.D., Pettis, H.M., Rolland, R.M., Schick, R.S. , 2024 , Fishing gear entanglement threatens recovery of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales

Global

Hooks and Lines
N/A Seabirds Summary study
Summary:

This research investigates the overlap of potentially illegal longlining efforts and their effects on the average risk of albatrosses. Results indicate that albatrosses are at particularly higher risk in areas where illegal longlining vessels are found, and that those vessels are spatially concentrated to areas of the highest concentrations of CRAAVED (concealable, removable, abundant, accessible, valuable, enjoyable, disposable) fish species.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Petrossian, G.A., Pires, S.F., Sosnowski, M., Venu, P., Olah, G., 2022 , Threats of Longline Fishing to Global Albatross Biodiversity

Germany

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Study in the lab
Summary:

This study was a controlled experiment within in a harbor that investigated the effectiveness of attaching small, reflective objects (8mm wide acrylic glass spheres) to standard gillnets to increase acoustic reflectivity and therefore mitigate bycatch of small, echolocating cetaceans. The study found that the spheres increased the acoustic backscattering strength and echo, which suggests that the spears would be an effective way to reduce small cetacean bycatch. Gillnets with sphere-sphere distance of 20cm performed best. 

Effect on Bycatch: Spheres increased acoustic backscattering strength and echo
Reference:
Kratzer, I.M.F., Stepputtis, D., Santos, J., Lutkefedder, F., Stoltenberg, A., Hartkens, L., Schaber, M., Kindt-Larsen, L., Larsen, F. , 2022 , Angle-dependent acoustic reflectivity of gillnets and their modifications to reduce bycatch of odontocetes using sonar imaging

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • Current page 50
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in