Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 721 - 730 of 767
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

N/A

N/A
Hook size
Elasmobranchs, Skates/Rays, Pteroplatytrygon violacea (Pelagic stingray) Summary study
Summary:

A literature review of 30 studies was conducted to determine the  effectiveness of various bycatch reduction devices for elasmobranchs. The risk of capture was 1.2 times higher on circle hooks but haulbaulk mortality as well as deep hooking was reduced. Wire leaders had higher shark catch and haulback mortality rates compared to monofilament. Hooking position is determined by the hook shape and width combined with bait. These characteristics also affect the ability to sever monofilament leaders. Shark catch rates and deep hooking were increased when fish was used for bait compared to squid. Wider hooks resulted in reduced pelagic stingray (Pteroplatytrygon violacea) catch and mortality.

Effect on Bycatch: Wider hooks resulted in reduced pelagic stingray (Pteroplatytrygon violacea) catch and mortality
Reference:
GIlman, E., Chaloupka, M., Swimmer, Y. and S. Piovano, 2016 , A cross-taxa assessment of pelagic longline bycatch mitigation measures: conflicts and mutual benefits to elasmobranchs

North Sea; Baltic Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal), Phoca vitulina (Harbor seal), Seabirds, Melanitta fusca (Velvet scoter), Somateria mollissima (Common eider) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Threatened common bycatch species in the Baltic Sea and North Sea include harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), common eider (Somateria mollissima) and velvet scoter (Melanitta fusca), as well as the non-threatened grey seal (Halichoerus gryphus) and harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Interactions primarily occur in static net gear, such as gillnets and trammel nets, mainly used by coastal small-scale fisheries. Although technical bycatch mitigation methods are available for most fishing gears interacting with cetaceans and seals, measures focused on mitigating seabird interactions with gillnets are limited.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Riihimaa, J. , 2026 , Bycatch of marine mammals and seabirds in the commercial fisheries of the Baltic Sea and North Sea: Impacts, mitigation methods, and future directions

Hawaii, United States

Hooks and Lines
N/A
Dyed bait

Night sets

Side sets
Seabirds, Phoebastria immutabilis (Laysan albatross), Phoebastria nigripes (Black-footed albatross) Summary study
Summary:

A retrospective analysis evaluated how mitigation measures in Hawaii (U.S)'s shallow-and deep-set longline fisheries influenced the probability of interaction and disposition (alive v. dead) of Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis) and black-footed (P. nigripes) albatrosses. Most mitigation measures efficiently reduced seabird bycatch, however, few influenced whether interactions were fatal. In the shallow-set fishery, side-setting and stern-setting proved equally effective. Night-setting is highly effective at reducing interactions, though interaction and mortality rates were much higher during the full moon, when most shallow-set effort occurs. The use of blue-dyed bait and strategic offal/bait discharge were associated with increased interactions. 

 

Effect on Bycatch: Side setting and stern setting equally effective. Effectiveness of night setting decreases during full moon. Blue-dyed bait and strategic offal/bait discharge increases interactions.
Reference:
Van Wert, Jacey C., Robert NM Ahrens, Emily Crigler, T. Todd Jones, Michael Marsik, Lynn Rassel, Emily Reynolds, Yonat Swimmer, and Zachary A. Siders, 2026 , Retrospective analysis identifies largely effective seabird mitigation strategies with some opportunities for improvement

N/A

Pots
Flatfish (plaice as model species)
Gear modification: Other
Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level), Gadus morhua (Atlantic cod) Study in the lab
Summary:

This study investigated how flatfish interact with pot entrances, employing European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) as a model species. Behavioral trials in a net-pen were conducted to observe plaice interacting with different pot entrance designs. Pot entrance position played a key role in plaice interactions with the gear. Low entrances near the seabed facilitated entry, while higher entrances reduced exit probability. Entrance size  and the presence and position of funnels had little effect. 

Effect on Bycatch: Not studied
Reference:
Berzosa, S.A., Noack, T., Hermann, A., Milanelli, A.M., Flores, F., Van Vlasselaer, J., Dahlke, F. and Stepputtis, D.,, 2026 , Designing pot entrances for flatfish: behavioral responses of European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and implications for fisheries

Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada

Trawls
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis)
Modified ground gear (mobile)
Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level), Invertebrates, Corals, sponges, other benthic invertebrates (not specified to species level) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study evaluated a novel experimental bottom trawl equipped with a double-wheeled footgear developed for the inshore northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) fishery in Atlantic Canada. The gear combines two rockhopper disks per unit, aligned with the towing direction, aiming to reduce seabed impact while maintaining catch efficiency. Catch rates and size selectivity for target species were similar to traditional trawl gear, however, the experimental trawl produced significantly higher bycatch of juvenile groundfish, and captured more sea pens (Order Pennatulacea), providing evidence of unintended seabed disturbance. 

Effect on Bycatch: Increased
Reference:
de Lima, A.J.A., Araya-Schmidt, T., Winger, P.D. and Murphy, A.J., 2026 , Toward sustainable trawling: Evaluating a double-wheeled trawl footgear in the northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) fishery

U.S. Mid-Atlantic

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Monkfish (Lophius sp.)
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin), Bony Fishes, Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus (Atlantic sturgeon) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Monkfish (Lophius sp.) in the US mid-Atlantic and northeast are targeted through sink gillnets that also capture Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus). Large-mesh gillnets are required to fish seasonally using tie-downs as part of the Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan. This study looked at the effects of tie-downs (control: 12 meshes x 30.5 cm stretch mesh with four mesh tie-downs, experimental: same, no tie-downs) on Atlantic sturgeon and marine mammal bycatch. Atlantic sturgeon bycatch (CPUE) did not differ between gillnet configurations. The experimental gillnets without tie-downs significantly decreased monkfish landings and resulted in common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) mortalities.       

Effect on Bycatch: Increase in common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) mortalities.
Reference:
Fox, D., Armstrong J., and Brown, L., 2011 , Completion Report for Sturgeon Gillnet Study (number EA 133F-10-RQ-1160)

United States

Traps
Multi-species
Excluder devices
Freshwater Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Wisconsin-type fyke nets were modified in an effort to reduce the incidental bycatch of turtles, without significantly reducing the catch of targeted fish species.  The tests were conducted in three rivers (Missouri, Mississippi and Gasconade) in Missouri (United States).  The net was modified by adding four lines in the vertical gap of the net and this modification was successful at significantly reducing turtle bycatch with no significant decrease in the quantity of fish caught.

Effect on Bycatch: Significant reduction in bycatch
Reference:
Fratto, Z.W., Barko, V.A. and Scheibe, J.S., 2008 , Development and efficacy of a bycatch reduction device for Wisconsin-type fyke nets deployed in freshwater systems

United States

Traps
Flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris)
Excluder devices
Freshwater Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Three modified hoop-net designs were tested in the Gasconade and Osage Rivers of Missouri (United States) to determine their ability to reduce turtle bycatch without reducing the capture of targeted catfish (Pylodictis olivaris).  The three designs included an excluder net with tightly spread mesh and a sewn in ring, a chimney-set design and a loose-weave design.  The chimney-net design was the only one that significantly reduced turtle bycatch (84%), while not decreasing the number of average size of flathead catfish.

Effect on Bycatch: Chimney net design reduced turtle bycatch
Reference:
Fratto, Z.W., Barko, V.A., Pitts, P.R., Sheriff, S.L., Briggler, J.T., Sullivan, K.P., McKeage, B.L. and Johnson, T.R., 2008 , Evaluation of turtle exclusion and escapement devices for hoop-nets

Field study in the wild

Canada

Traps
Spot prawn (Pandalus platyceros)
Trap-net modification
Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Modified trap openings were developed to reduce juvenile rockfish bycatch (Sebastes sp.) in British Columbia (Canada) spot prawn (Pandalus platyceros) traps. Smaller trap openings had no impact on rockfish or other non-target species bycatch. A novel bent tunnel opening resulted in no rockfish bycatch and the exclusion of other fish species. However, all trap modifications resulted in reductions in prawn catch rates. Large prawns were also excluded more than small prawns.  

Effect on Bycatch: A novel bent tunnel opening resulted in no rockfish bycatch and the exclusion of other fish species.
Reference:
Favaro, B., Duff, S. D., Cote, I. M., 2012 , A trap with a twist: evaluating a bycatch reduction device to prevent rockfish capture in crustacean traps

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Current page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Page 77
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in