Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Review |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
NA |
Visual deterrents
|
Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pinnipeds, Seabirds, Sea Turtles, Bony Fishes | Summary study | This article reviewed bycatch mitigation methods that rely on sensory ecology to reduce interactions with seabirds, sea turtles, pinnipeds and blue-water fish. Panels containing patterns of low spatial frequency and high internal contrast can be used for all of these species. These panels are not likely to reduce catches of target species and are easy and inexpensive to apply. The authors suggest that sound signals on gillnets are not recommended for most bycatch species, except for cetaceans. Cetaceans require both visual cues and warning through echolocation. |
Canada |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Cod (Gadus morhua) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) | Seabirds | Summary study | The authors investigated the effects of a large-scale gillnet closure on sea bird populations in Canadian waters. After a 1992 closure, breeding populations of bycatch-prone diving birds (auks and gannets) increased, with a corresponding decrease in surface-feeding scavengers such as gulls that are less prone to bycatch in gillnets but that do consume fisheries discards. Closure resulted in increased populations of common murres and auks but a decrease in gulls |
|
Tyrrhenian Sea |
Trawls
|
Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) and greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) |
Excluder devices
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | 90 mm excluder grid did not reduce catches of blackmouth catshark (Galeus melastomus) |
NE Atlantic |
Hooks and Lines
|
Tuna and blue shark |
Electromagnetic deterrents
|
Sharks, Prionace glauca (Blue shark) | Field study in the wild | Pelagic longline hooks equipped with magnets were tested for their ability to repel blue sharks (Prionace glauca). Tests were conducted aboard pelagic longliners operating in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. Two magnets, one large and one small, were tested. Magnets were manually attached to the hooks (polarized so the magnet field was oriented N or S and in parallel with the hook axis). Three test zones, each with 5 hooks with 1 magnet, 11 hooks with 2 magnets and 16 control hooks, were deployed along a longline. The results indicated that blue shark catch rates were not reduced with the use of magnets, and can instead have an increased attractive effect. The attraction was higher with the large magnet. Magnets increased blue shark catch rates. Larger magnets had a stronger effect. |
South Georgia Island |
Hooks and Lines
|
Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) | Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Orcinus orca (Orca whale), Physeter macrocephalus (Sperm whale), Pinnipeds, Arctocephalus gazella (Antarctic fur seal) | Field study in the wild | Depredation by Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella), sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) and orcas (Orcinus orca) were studied in a Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) fishery operating around South Georgia Island. While sperm whales come in contact with about one third of longlines (averaged over 1997 and 2012), depredation events from this species were considered insignificant. Orcas interacted with only 5% (averaged over 1997 and 2012) of longlines, but can remove over half the catch during an interaction. Interactions with orcas are spatially limited to migration routes; however, fishing is concentrated in these areas during migrations times. Interactions with fur seals were the most frequent until 2009, averaging just under 9% from 1997-2012. The catch-per-unit-effort of toothfish was higher when no mammals were observed near longlines. Sperm whales interacted with longlines 25% of the time; orcas interacted only 5% of the time could remove half of the catch; fur seal interactions have declined since 2009 |
|
United States |
Hooks and Lines
|
Billfish (various) |
Alternative bait
Artificial bait
Circle hooks
|
Bony Fishes | Summary study | The authors conducted a review of post release mortality studies on billfish caught in recreational fisheries. Despite relatively so few studies involving many variables, the authors were able to detect some trends: 1) High speed trolling with artificial lures or a lure/natural bait combination (usually with J hooks) result in low amounts of internal hooking, tissue trauma and post release mortality; and 2) slow troll fisheries using natural baits or lure/bait combinations and circle hooks result in reduced rates of internal hooking, tissue trauma and sometimes post-release mortality. High speed trolling with J hooks and artificial bait and slow trolling with circle hooks and natural bait resulted in less internal hooking, tissue damage and increase post release survival. |
Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay, Japan |
N/A | Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Neophocoena spp. (Finless porpoise) | Study in the lab | A Leslie Matrix model was used to simulate the impact of bycatch mortality on the narrow-ridged finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis). Based on the model results, there is an annual rate of decrease of 0.671 to 3.87%, with a population reduction of 29.6 to 86.3% over three generations. The most optimistic simulation showed at least a 30% reduction in population size. Therefore, reported bycatch mortality rates pose a substantial threat to this species. |
||
Swedish coast |
Traps
|
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) |
Excluder devices
|
Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal), Phoca vitulina (Harbor seal) | Field study in the wild | Experiments were conducted along the Swedish coast to investigate the impact of seal exclusion devices (SEDs) on seal bycatch. Pot entrances were fitted with SEDs of different shapes and sizes. The pots were a two-chambered single entrance floating cod pot. Pots were equipped with a 45 mm escape window. Experimental pots had vertically mounted metal frames that were secured with nylon line. Five different types of SEDs were used. They had different metal frames, different shapes, thickness of material or inner circumference. Bycatch of seals was reduced to zero when SEDs were used and the pots' catchability was not negatively affected. The symmetrical oval shaped entrance and larger rectangle shaped entrance (two smaller openings) increased the pots' catchability. |
Italy |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Bony fish | Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) | Field study in the wild | A study was conducted in the waters off the coast of Archipelago de La Maddalena (Italy) to determine the impact bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) had on gillnet fisheries targeting a variety of fish species. The study showed that the catch per unit effort of target species was significantly higher when there were no dolphin interactions. There were also differences in the species composition of nets attacked and not attacked by dolphins. Those nets attacked by dolphins showed a reduction in the catch of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) while catches of scorpionfish (Scorpaena spp.) increased. In nets not attacked by dolphins, red mullet was the most common species. In nets attacked by dolphins, scorpionfish were the predominate species caught. |
|
Portugal |
Surrounding nets and seine nets
|
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) | Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | A study was conducted on observed interactions between a Portuguese purse-seine fishery and cetaceans. Cetaceans, primarily common dolphins (Delphinus delphis), were present during 16.9% of fishing events. The majority of these occurrences happened during the summer and early fall, and during the night. The presence of cetaceans was significantly linked to sardine (Sardina pilchardus) catches, effort and latitude/longitude. Encirclement of cetaceans occurred in 2.3% of fishing events, with moralities occurring in 1%. Common dolphin, bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) were all encircled, with mortalities only recorded for common dolphins. Estimated annual mortality rates for the common dolphin are 113 individuals. Cetaceans were present during 16.9% of fishing events; encirclement led to common dolphin mortalities |