Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 121 - 130 of 767
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Brazil

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
NA
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Sotalia fluviatilis (Tucuxi) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Underwater acoustic pingers were tested in Brazil to evaluate the behavioral responses of tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis). Five pingers were evenly placed on a floating 100 m line set along the dolphins' swimming parth in and out of sheltered waters. Dolphin sighting frequencies were recorded for functional and dummy pingers and control trials. Dolphin sightings were significantly lower in areas where the pinger line was set. Sighting frequency was significantly lower with active pingers than in dummy or control trials, but there wre no significant differences between the dummy and control trials. Preliminary results suggest that acoustic pingers attached to gillnets may be used to successfully prevent tucuxi bycatch.

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly reduced sightings of dolphins
Reference:
Montiero-Neto, C., Avila, F.J.C., Alves, T.T., Araujo, D.S., Campos, A.A., Martins, A.M.A., Parente, C.L., Furtado-Neto, M.A.A., Lien, J., 2004 , Behavioral responses of Sotalia fluviatilis (Cetacea, Delphinidae) to acoustic pingers, Fortaleza, Brazil

Baltic Sea

Traps
Salmon
Acoustic deterrent devices
Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic harassment devices (AHDs) with a source level of 179 dB re 1 µPa rms at 1 m were deployed during three consecutive fishing seasons. Fish catches in traps with AHDs were significantly higher than in the controls, while catch damage in the traps with AHDs was lower. However, towards the end of the fishing season catch damage increased in traps with AHDs.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced depredation of salmon traps by grey seals (Halichoerus grypus)
Reference:
Fjälling, A., Wahlbergb, M. and Westerber, H., 2006 , Acoustic harassment devices reduce seal interaction in the Baltic salmon-trap, net fishery

Shannon Estuary, Ireland

not applicable Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Trials to assess the behavioral response of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to continuous and responsive pingers were conducted. In boat-based trials both types of pingers affected dolphin behavior, while in static trials, the detection of dolphin vocalizations was significantly lower in the presence of active continuous pingers.

Effect on Bycatch: Change in behaviour of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in boat based trials.
Reference:
Leeney, R.H., Berrow, S., McGrath, D., O'Brien, J., Cosgrove, R. & Godley, B.J., 2007 , Effects of pingers on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins

Balearic Islands, Spain

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Mixed species
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

A large scale pinger trial was conducted and results showed a 49% decrease dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation rates when pingers were active. However the different pinger brands tried were not equally effective in reducing depredation. The AQUAmark 210 pingers had significant results, while Dukane Netmark 1000 and SaveWave Dolphinsaver High-impact did not have significant results. Profit per unit increased 9%.

Effect on Bycatch: 49% reduction in depredation rate by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)
Reference:
Brotons, J.M., Munilla, Z., Grau, A.M., Rendell, L., 2008 , Do pingers reduce interactions between bottlenose dolphins and nets around the Balearic Islands?

Balearic Islands, Spain

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The experiment tested the effects of Aquamark 100 pingers on the depredation rate of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) on trammel nets. Results showed nets equipped with pingers had 87% fewer holes (attributed to damage by dolphins) than nets without pingers.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation
Reference:
Gazo, M., Gonzalvo, ,J. and A. Aguilar, 2008 , Pingers as deterrents of bottlenose dolphins interacting with trammel nets

North Carolina, USA

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Mixed
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors tested the behavioral response of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to gill nets equipped with active and control Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers. Although dolphins were observed significantly fewer times within a 100m circular buffer zone from the alarms, overall results showed no significant differences in the number of groups observed, or closest approaches by animals to the net, between active and control periods.

Effect on Bycatch: No difference on group size or closest approach to the net between active and control pingers
Reference:
Cox, T.M, Read, A.J., Swanner, D., Urian, K. and D. Waples, 2004 , Behavioral responses of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, to gillnets and acoustic alarms

Danish North Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Cod
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch was significantly lower (p<0.01) in high-density Iron Oxide (IO) gill nets compared to control nets. There was no significant difference in the acoustic target strength of the IO and control nets, and both nets behaved similarly in flume tank tests. The authors conclude the reduction of harbour porpoise bycatch in the IO nets was a result of the mechanical properties of the nets.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbour porpoise bycatch
Reference:
Larsen, F., Eigaard, O.R. and J. Tougaard, 2007 , Reduction of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch by iron-oxide gillnets

North Carolina, USA

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Spanish mackerel and spot
Tensioning gillnet
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

The potential of modifying gillnets to reduce shark bycatch was investigated in the US Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus)  and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) gillnet fisheries. The modified net had larger floats on the head-rope and increased weight on the lead-line to increase the tension of the net. Results showed that the catch rate of some shark species was significantly reduced in the modified gillnets. Target catch rates of Spanish mackerel did not differ significantly between control and modified nets of the same mesh size.

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly reduced bycatch of some shark species
Reference:
Thorpe, T. and Frierson, D, 2009 , Bycatch mitigation assessment for sharks caught in coastal anchored gillnets

Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean

Surrounding nets and seine nets
Tuna (largely yellowfin (Thunnus albacares), skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), and bigeye (T. obesus)
Time area closures
Sharks, Carcharhinus falciformis (Silky shark) Summary study
Summary:

In the eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fishery, a large fraction of non-mammal bycatch is captured by purse-seine gear when nets are deployed around floating objects. The researchers examined the spatial distribution of a dominant species in this fishery’s bycatch, the silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), from 1994 to 2005 to determine whether spatial closures might effectively reduce the bycatch of this species. The researchers identified candidate locations for fishery closures that specifically considered the trade-off between bycatch reduction and the loss of tuna catch and evaluated ancillary conservation benefits to less commonly captured taxa. Smoothed spatial distributions of silky shark bycatch did not indicate persistent small areas of especially high bycatch for any size class of shark over the 12-year period. Nevertheless, bycatch of small silky sharks (<90 cm total length) was consistently higher north of the equator during all years. The researchers evaluated nearly 100 candidate closure areas between 5◦N and 15◦ N that could have reduced, by as much as 33%, the total silky shark bycatch while compromising only 12% of the tuna catch. Closures also suggested reductions in the bycatch of other vulnerable taxa, including other shark species and turtles. 

Effect on Bycatch: Candidate closure areas could have reduced total bycatch by as much as 33%
Reference:
Watson, J., T. Essington, C. Lennert-Cody, and M. Hall, 2008 , Trade-offs in the Design of Fishery Closures: Management of Silky Shark Bycatch in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Tuna Fishery

Türkiye

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Gillnets fitted with Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers had significantly less bycatch of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) than control nets and the fish size and catch rates of the target species were not affected.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise interactions with gillnet
Reference:
Göener, S., Bilgin, S., 2009 , The effect of pingers on harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena bycatch and fishing effort in the turbot gill net fishery in the Turkish Black Sea coast

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Current page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in