Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
NA |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Sotalia fluviatilis (Tucuxi) | Field study in the wild | Underwater acoustic pingers were tested in Brazil to evaluate the behavioral responses of tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis). Five pingers were evenly placed on a floating 100 m line set along the dolphins' swimming parth in and out of sheltered waters. Dolphin sighting frequencies were recorded for functional and dummy pingers and control trials. Dolphin sightings were significantly lower in areas where the pinger line was set. Sighting frequency was significantly lower with active pingers than in dummy or control trials, but there wre no significant differences between the dummy and control trials. Preliminary results suggest that acoustic pingers attached to gillnets may be used to successfully prevent tucuxi bycatch. |
Baltic Sea |
Traps
|
Salmon |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal) | Field study in the wild | Acoustic harassment devices (AHDs) with a source level of 179 dB re 1 µPa rms at 1 m were deployed during three consecutive fishing seasons. Fish catches in traps with AHDs were significantly higher than in the controls, while catch damage in the traps with AHDs was lower. However, towards the end of the fishing season catch damage increased in traps with AHDs. Reduced depredation of salmon traps by grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) |
Shannon Estuary, Ireland |
not applicable | Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) | Field study in the wild | Trials to assess the behavioral response of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to continuous and responsive pingers were conducted. In boat-based trials both types of pingers affected dolphin behavior, while in static trials, the detection of dolphin vocalizations was significantly lower in the presence of active continuous pingers. Change in behaviour of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in boat based trials. |
||
Balearic Islands, Spain |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Mixed species |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | A large scale pinger trial was conducted and results showed a 49% decrease dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation rates when pingers were active. However the different pinger brands tried were not equally effective in reducing depredation. The AQUAmark 210 pingers had significant results, while Dukane Netmark 1000 and SaveWave Dolphinsaver High-impact did not have significant results. Profit per unit increased 9%. 49% reduction in depredation rate by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) |
Balearic Islands, Spain |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | The experiment tested the effects of Aquamark 100 pingers on the depredation rate of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) on trammel nets. Results showed nets equipped with pingers had 87% fewer holes (attributed to damage by dolphins) than nets without pingers. Reduced bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation |
North Carolina, USA |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Mixed |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | The authors tested the behavioral response of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to gill nets equipped with active and control Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers. Although dolphins were observed significantly fewer times within a 100m circular buffer zone from the alarms, overall results showed no significant differences in the number of groups observed, or closest approaches by animals to the net, between active and control periods. No difference on group size or closest approach to the net between active and control pingers |
Danish North Sea |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Cod |
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
|
Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch was significantly lower (p<0.01) in high-density Iron Oxide (IO) gill nets compared to control nets. There was no significant difference in the acoustic target strength of the IO and control nets, and both nets behaved similarly in flume tank tests. The authors conclude the reduction of harbour porpoise bycatch in the IO nets was a result of the mechanical properties of the nets. Reduced harbour porpoise bycatch |
North Carolina, USA |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Spanish mackerel and spot |
Tensioning gillnet
|
Sharks | Field study in the wild | The potential of modifying gillnets to reduce shark bycatch was investigated in the US Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) gillnet fisheries. The modified net had larger floats on the head-rope and increased weight on the lead-line to increase the tension of the net. Results showed that the catch rate of some shark species was significantly reduced in the modified gillnets. Target catch rates of Spanish mackerel did not differ significantly between control and modified nets of the same mesh size. Significantly reduced bycatch of some shark species |
Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean |
Surrounding nets and seine nets
|
Tuna (largely yellowfin (Thunnus albacares), skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), and bigeye (T. obesus) |
Time area closures
|
Sharks, Carcharhinus falciformis (Silky shark) | Summary study | In the eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fishery, a large fraction of non-mammal bycatch is captured by purse-seine gear when nets are deployed around floating objects. The researchers examined the spatial distribution of a dominant species in this fishery’s bycatch, the silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), from 1994 to 2005 to determine whether spatial closures might effectively reduce the bycatch of this species. The researchers identified candidate locations for fishery closures that specifically considered the trade-off between bycatch reduction and the loss of tuna catch and evaluated ancillary conservation benefits to less commonly captured taxa. Smoothed spatial distributions of silky shark bycatch did not indicate persistent small areas of especially high bycatch for any size class of shark over the 12-year period. Nevertheless, bycatch of small silky sharks (<90 cm total length) was consistently higher north of the equator during all years. The researchers evaluated nearly 100 candidate closure areas between 5◦N and 15◦ N that could have reduced, by as much as 33%, the total silky shark bycatch while compromising only 12% of the tuna catch. Closures also suggested reductions in the bycatch of other vulnerable taxa, including other shark species and turtles. Candidate closure areas could have reduced total bycatch by as much as 33% |
Türkiye |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Gillnets fitted with Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers had significantly less bycatch of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) than control nets and the fish size and catch rates of the target species were not affected. Reduced harbor porpoise interactions with gillnet |