Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N/A |
N/A |
Electromagnetic deterrents
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Negaprion brevirostris (Lemon shark), Sphyrna tiburo (Bonnethead shark) | Study in the lab | Tests with lanthanide metals were conducted to determine their potential application as a shark repellent in longline fisheries. Six lanthanide metals were tested (cerium (Ce), neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), cerium-lanthanum mischmetal (CeLa), praseodymium neodymium metal alloy (PrNdA) and praseodymium neodymium mischmetal (PrNdM)) to quantify their voltage and compare dissolution rates in seawater. A behavioral study was used to determine their efficacy in deterring bonnethead (Sphyrna tiburo) and lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris). There were no differences in the voltages produced by the metals and their voltages decreased with distance from the samples. Freshwater produced the greatest voltages, which decreased logarithmically as salinity increased to 10 ppt. The metals had significantly different dissolution rates, except Nd and Pr. The time to dissolution ranged from 15.6 hrs for PrDnA to 107.6 for CeLa (lot 2). Behavioral tests were only conducted with Nd, which was not effective in repelling either shark species. Neodymium (Nd) was not effective at repelling either shark species |
|
United States Atlantic Ocean |
Hooks and Lines
|
Primarily swordfish and yellowfin tuna |
Circle hooks
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Skates/Rays, Pteroplatytrygon violacea (Pelagic stingray), Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level) | Field study in the wild | Circle hooks and J-style hooks were tested on pelagic longline vessels (US Atlantic) to determine if the use of circle hooks reduced bycatch mortality while maintaining target species catch rates. 00 offset circle hooks were determined to increase the survival of bycatch species at haulback while having little impact on target species catches. Specifically, J-style hooks had a significantly higher total overall catch rate. Catch rates of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the fall were higher (significantly) for circle hooks and pelagic stingrays (Pteroplatytrygon violacea, spring caught) were the only species that had a significantly higher catch rate on J-style hooks. Circle hooks caught four times as many yellowfin tuna in the mouth compared to J-style hooks. Yellowfin tuna and dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) caught on circle hooks in the fall and spring respectively, were significantly larger than those caught on J-style hooks. Survival rates of dolphinfish and escolar (Lepidocybium flavobrunneum) were statistically higher at haulback when circle hooks were used in the fall and spring respectively. Circle hooks caught fewer bycatch species (except for pelagic stringrays) |
Isle of Man |
Dredge
|
Queen scallop (Aequipecten opercularis) |
Gear modification: Other
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Scyliorhinus canicula (Small-spotted catshark), Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level), Invertebrates, Corals, sponges, other benthic invertebrates (not specified to species level) | Field study in the wild | A new toothless dredge design called the "Newhaven" was tested in the Isle of Man queen scallop (Aequipecten opercularis) fishery, to determine its effect on both catch and bycatch. This new dredge design caught significantly more queen scallops compared to the traditional tooth dredge. However, there was no significant difference between the abundance of bycatch between the two dredge designs. Bycatch species composition between the two dredge types was relatively similar but the "Newhaven" dredge did catch a significant number of dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula). No significant difference, slight increase in catch of dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) |
Canada |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) |
Electromagnetic deterrents
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Prionace glauca (Blue shark) | Field study in the wild | Blue sharks (Prionace glauca) account for most of the bycatch in the Canadian pelagic longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery. Electropositive metals (e.g. lanthanide) oxidize in seawater and create electric fields, which can alter the behaviors of several species of sharks. Researchers deployed seven sets (6300 hooks) with three hook treatments (standard hooks, hooks with electropositive metals - neodymium/praseodymium - and hooks with lead weights) on the Scotian Shelf in the Northwest Atlantic. Electropositive metals did not reduce the catch of blue sharks or other common shark bycatch species. |
Hawaii, United States |
Hooks and Lines
|
Pelagic fish |
Circle hooks
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Alopias superciliosus (Bigeye thresher shark), Carcharhinus longimanus (Oceanic whitetip shark), Prionace glauca (Blue shark), Seabirds, Sea Turtles | Summary study | Analyses of the Hawaiian (U.S.) pelagic longline fishery were conducted to determine what factors, including hook type (J or circle) and location (sea mount v open ocean), have impacted the catch of both target and bycatch species. Standardized catch rates for all tuna species as well as for blue (Prionace glauca) and oceanic whitetip sharks (Carcharhinus longimanus) were significantly higher when the wider circle hooks were used. However, shortbill spearfish (Tetrapturus angustirostris) and striped marlin (Kajikia audax) catch were significantly lower when circle hooks were used. No differences in catch rates between the two hook types were seen for bigeye thresher sharks (Alopias superciliosus) or swordfish (Xiphias gladius). The average swordfish lengths were significantly larger when circle hooks were used, while average lengths for bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and skipjack tunas (Katsuwonus pelamis) were significantly smaller. There was no difference in the average length between the two hooks types for yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) or albacore tunas (Thunnus alalunga), spearfish or marlins. In addition, the change from J hooks to circle was likely a factor in declining sea turtle bycatch rates. |
Mediterranean Sea |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) | Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Prionace glauca (Blue shark), Bony Fishes, Ruvettus pretiosus (Oilfish) | Field study in the wild | Blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and oilfish (Ruvettus pretiosus) are frequently caught incidentally in the swordfish (Xiphias gladius) surface drifting longline fishery of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. An information theoretic generalized additive model approach, modelling separately: (1) the probability of making a catch; and (2) the positive catch rates, suggested the presence of intra-annual variations in their abundance and revealed interesting associations with some environmental features. Blue sharks were more frequently encountered during late summer in cool water masses. However, the likelihood of making a larger catch peaked in warmer waters through late spring in the vicinity of land. Occurrences of blue sharks were more frequent to the south-west (Ionian Sea), while positive catch rates were higher in the eastern-most regions (Levantine). Oilfish occurrences, as well as catch rates, were always above average to the east. Intra-annual variation was analogous to that of blue sharks. The species showed a preference for cooler water bodies and its distribution was strongly dictated by the lunar cycle. Annual time series showed a decreasing trend of blue sharks abundance. Catch rates for both species depended on fishing gear configuration. Deeper settings (.20 m), more resilient lines and use of fish attractant light-sticks increased the probability of capturing a fish. |
|
Costa Rica |
Hooks and Lines
|
N/A | Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Carcharhinus falciformis (Silky shark), Skates/Rays, Pteroplatytrygon violacea (Pelagic stingray), Sea Turtles, Lepidochelys olivacea (Olive (Pacific) ridley sea turtle) | Summary study | An observer program assessed the impact of the Costa Rican longline fishery on bycatch species from 1999 to 2010. Observers recorded species, sex, reproductive state, and dimensions of all animals captured. They also recorded information about individual longlines, including location, set and haul back times, hook type, hook number, bait used, target species, and total number of hooks. The longline fishery caught a large number of silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis), olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea), and pelagic stingrays (Pteroplatytrygon violacea). The authors estimate that 699,600 olive ridleys were caught between 1999 and 2010, including 92,300 adult females. The captures correspond with a decline in nesting populations nearby and statistically significant size decreases in mature turtles. They also observed a decline in the average size of silky sharks. Geospatial analysis of the data indicated that there were temporal shifts in mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus) abundance, but fishing efforts did not shift with abundance. The authors suggest marine protected areas and/or time area closure to reduce the bycatch of sea turtles and sharks. |
|
Australia |
Trawls
|
Tiger and endeavour prawns (Peneaus and Metapenaeus sp.) |
Excluder devices
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Skates/Rays, Sea Turtles, Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level) | Field study in the wild | Two new types of turtle excluder devices were tested in the Northern Australia prawn fishery to determine their ability to exclude sea turtles from capture. The first design, JT 1, had a large escape opening across the width of the top panel ahead of the codend, with the forward edge of the escape weighted down and the aft edge buoyed. This design did not prevent the capture of sea turtles or other large sharks and rays but caught 6.6% more tiger prawns (Peneaus sp.) and 10.5% more endeavour (Metapenaeus sp.) prawns than the standard net. The second design, JT 2, had two large holes (200 cm long x 30 meshes deep) cut into the side panels of the net ahead of the codend with the aft edge weighted and two standard (40 mesh wide) bigeye escape panels were added between the two side openings. The second design also did not prevent the capture of sea turtles or other large sharks and rays but did reduce finfish bycatch by 5% and caught 5.2% more tiger prawns and 6.9% more endeavour prawns compared to standard nets. Did not reduce bycatch of turtles and large sharks/rays. JT2 design reduced finfish bycatch |
China |
N/A | Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Skates/Rays, Mammals, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pinnipeds, Seabirds, Sea Turtles, Bony Fishes, Invertebrates | Summary study | A cumulative impact analysis framework integrating species habitat suitability and fishing effort data, stratified by gear type, was used to assess bycatch risk for threatened and protected species in China's seas and adjacent waters. Across all taxonomic groups examined, including seabirds, sea turtles, marine mammals, elasmobranchs, bony fishes, and benthic invertebrates, the highest bycatch risk was concentrated between 23°N and 25°N. For marine mammals and sea turtles, elevated risk was concentrated along China's southeastern coast, extending through inshore waters from the Yangtze River Estuary south to 20°N, with trawls and gillnets contributing most significantly to risk. Seabird bycatch hotspots were primarily located around islands, bays, and estuaries north of 20°N, where gillnets posed the greatest threat. Elasmobranchs experienced high bycatch risk from the Taiwan Strait to the Yangtze River Estuary and around Jeju Island, and were the most vulnerable taxa group overall. Bycatch risk for benthic invertebrates was largely restricted to narrow nearshore areas and was associated primarily with dredging activities. The study also found that marine protected areas generally exhibited lower bycatch risk than surrounding waters. |