At-sea testing and assessment of the John Thomas bigeye turtle excluder device as an approved TED for Australia's northern prawn fishery

Authors
Day, G.
Year
Journal/Publisher Name
Australian Maritime College
Page #s
1-18
Contact information
Garry Day
Fishing Technology Unit
Australian Maritime College
PO Box 21
Beaconsfield, Tasmania
Summary

Two new types of turtle excluder devices were tested in the Northern Australia prawn fishery to determine their ability to exclude sea turtles from capture.  The first design, JT 1, had a large escape opening across the width of the top panel ahead of the codend, with the forward edge of the escape weighted down and the aft edge buoyed.  This design did not prevent the capture of sea turtles or other large sharks and rays but caught 6.6% more tiger prawns (Peneaus sp.) and 10.5% more endeavour (Metapenaeus sp.) prawns than the standard net.  The second design, JT 2, had two large holes (200 cm long x 30 meshes deep) cut into the side panels of the net ahead of the codend with the aft edge weighted and two standard (40 mesh wide) bigeye escape panels were added between the two side openings.  The second design also did not prevent the capture of sea turtles or other large sharks and rays but did reduce finfish bycatch by 5% and caught 5.2% more tiger prawns and 6.9% more endeavour prawns compared to standard nets.

Field Studies

At-sea testing and assessment of the John Thomas bigeye turtle excluder device as an approved TED for Australia's northern prawn fishery

Study Type
Field study in the wild
Location
Australia
Target catch
Tiger and endeavour prawns (Peneaus and Metapenaeus sp.)
Effect on bycatch species
Did not reduce bycatch of turtles and large sharks/rays. JT2 design reduced finfish bycatch
Effect on target catch
Both designs increased prawn catch
Reduction technique
Fishing Gear