Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 91 - 100 of 141
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Western Baltic Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Passive acoustic deterrents
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Pearl Nets, a passive acoustic deterrent, were tested in commercial gillnet fisheries in the Western Baltic Sea. Compared to a control, the Peal Nets reduced harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch and maintained target catch rate for Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Effect on Bycatch: Prevented bycatch
Reference:
Kindt-Larsen, L., Noack, T., Books, M.E., Kroner, A.M., and Glemarec, G. , 2024 , Pearls are not just for girls: Plastic spheres do not interfere with target catches in a set net fishery

Germany

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Study in the lab
Summary:

This study was a controlled experiment within in a harbor that investigated the effectiveness of attaching small, reflective objects (8mm wide acrylic glass spheres) to standard gillnets to increase acoustic reflectivity and therefore mitigate bycatch of small, echolocating cetaceans. The study found that the spheres increased the acoustic backscattering strength and echo, which suggests that the spears would be an effective way to reduce small cetacean bycatch. Gillnets with sphere-sphere distance of 20cm performed best. 

Effect on Bycatch: Spheres increased acoustic backscattering strength and echo
Reference:
Kratzer, I.M.F., Stepputtis, D., Santos, J., Lutkefedder, F., Stoltenberg, A., Hartkens, L., Schaber, M., Kindt-Larsen, L., Larsen, F. , 2022 , Angle-dependent acoustic reflectivity of gillnets and their modifications to reduce bycatch of odontocetes using sonar imaging

Mexico

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A Mammals, Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena sinus (Vaquita) Summary study
Summary:

Science Letters: In 2022, Mexican authorities placed hundreds of concrete blocks with entangling metal hooks to discourage gill net use; as a result, there has been a substantial decline in gill net use in the area, and healthy vaquitas(Phocoena sinus) have been observed. However, in order to fully protect the vaquita from extinction, more of the population's distribution area need to be protected from gill nets.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Rojas-Bracho, L., Taylor, B.L., Reeves, R.R., Read, A., Barlow, J., Donovan, D., Thomas, P.O., Gulland, F., Mesnick, S.L., Brownwell Jr., R. L., Henry, A., Urban, J., Gerrodette, T., , 2024 , Mexico must save the vaquita from gill nets

N/A

N/A Mammals, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

This summary study provides the  first global meta-analyses  of small- and large-scale gillnet odontocete bycatch  during 1990–2020, and estimates that annual gillnet bycatch in this timespan is 50,000 odontocetes. It highlights the need for improved management of gillnet fisheries worldwide, noting that effective methods (spatial closures, deterrent devices, gear modifications, etc.) will vary depending on region and species, such as using acoustic deterrents in river ecosystems or electric barriers in the open ocean. 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Sonne, C., Lam, S.S., Foong, S.Y., Mahari, W.A.W., Ma, N.L., Bank, M.S. , 2024 , A global meta-analysis of gillnet bycatch of toothed whales: Mitigation measures and research gaps

Indian Ocean

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Tuna Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

In the Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries, cetacean bycatch is very high, but it is understudied and poorly understood. This paper investigates the issue and makes specific recommendations to strengthen knowledge and management: improve catch and bycatch reporting, increase research and analyses of cetaceans in the region in order to assess bycatch, revise the conservation measure adopted to address the bycatch of cetaceans in IOTC fisheries (Resolution 23/06) to include additional reporting for gillnets operating in EEZs, and expand the use of mitigation methods, such as setting gillnets 2m below the surface.

 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Elliott, B., Kiszka, J.J., Bonhommeau, S., Shahid, U., Lent, R., Nelson, L., Read, A.J., 2024 , Bycatch in drift gillnet fisheries: A sink for Indian Ocean cetaceans

Black Sea

N/A Mammals, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

This article summarizes cetacean strandings along the Bulgarian coast of the Black Sea between 2010-2022. Of a total 1,528 strandings, evidence of bycatch was present in 80 animals. The presence of strandings with signs of bycatch even during the seasonal bans on turbot (Scophthalmus maeoticus) fishing suggests that illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fisheries may be operating.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Popov, D., and Meshkova, G., 2024 , Cetacean Strandings along the Bulgarian Coast of the Black Sea in 2010–2022

French Polynesia

Hooks and Lines
N/A Elasmobranchs, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

 This study assesses bycatch and depredation  by sharks and odontocetes in the French Polynesian longline fishery between 2000 and 2018, and finds that less than 2% of the catch had been depredated, but shark bycatch was high (20,000 sharks annually, 0.5 shark every 1000 hooks). Conversely, odontocete bycatch was comparatively low  (13 occurrences in 18 years), though reporting may have been inaccurate. This is important as there is a plan to  double offshore fisheries production in the French Polynesia EEZ by 2027.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Biquet, J.A., Tixier, P., Richard, G., Soehnlen, M., Thellier, T., Carzon, P., Clua, E., Guinet, G. , 2024 , Toothed whale and shark depredation and bycatch in the longline fishery of French Polynesia

Portugal

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
NA Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Summary study
Summary:

This study evaluated the cetacean interactions with a bottom-set net fishery along the mainland Portuguese Southern coast (Algarve) from 2018-2022. Depredation by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) occurred in 17.7% of hauls, while bycatch occurred in <1%. Depredation was elevated in the spring and winter months and in gears targeting red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) and hake (Merluccius sp.). 

Effect on Bycatch: NA
Reference:
Marçalo, A., Samel, V., Carvalho, F., Frade, M., Erzini, K., Gonçalves, J.M., 2024 , Evaluating dolphin interactions with bottom-set net fisheries off Southern Iberian Atlantic waters

Black Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Turbot (Scophthalmus spp) Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study investigated harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)  bycatch in bottom gillnets and trammel nets targeting turbot (Scophthalmus spp.) in the Black Sea between 2019-2021 via independent observers, questionnaires and stranding data. Cetaceans were caught on 55% of trips, and most were harbor porpoises. The study confirmed that bycatch is the most serious and immediate threat to the Black Sea harbor porpoises, with as many as 16,200 individuals caught annually. 

Effect on Bycatch: Bycatch rates showed seasonal variation with marked increase in summer, compared to spring. Total annual bycatch of harbour seals in Black Sea estimated to be between 11,826 and 16 200 individuals.
Reference:
Popov, D., Meshkova, G., Vishnyakova, K., Ivanchikova, J., Paiu, M., Timofte, C., Amaha Öztürk, A., Tonay, A.M., Dede, A., Panayotova, M. and Düzgüneş, E., 2023 , Assessment of the bycatch level for the Black Sea harbour porpoise in the light of new data on population abundance

South China Sea

N/A Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Rhinocodon typus (Whale shark), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Neophocoena spp. (Finless porpoise), Sousa chinensis (Humpback dolphin), Sea Turtles Summary study
Summary:

This study investigated bycatch events in the northern South China Sea through interviews of fishers. The majority of interviewed fishers reported an estimated 7,464 annual bycatch events, with sea turtles encountered most commonly followed by Indo-Pacific finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides), whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis). The gear most associated with bycatch were gillnets, trawl nets, and seine nets. Modeling suggests that bycatch may be influenced by distance from the coast and water depth for marine mammals and sea turtles, but by administrative region for whale sharks.

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Lin, M., Liu, M., Turvey, S.T. and Li, S., 2023 , An interview-based investigation of marine megafauna bycatch in the northern South China Sea

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Current page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in