Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 1 - 10 of 99
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Bahamas

Hooks and Lines
shrimp Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: Magnets placed above hooks on longline gear created a strong magnetic field to reduce bycatch of nurse, lemon, and 4 additional shark species.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch

Hawaii, United States

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius), other pelagics
Alternative bait
Elasmobranchs, Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii (U.S.)-based longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions.

Effect on Bycatch: Decreased by 36%
Reference:
Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell, and I. Kinan-Kelly, 2007 , Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Tuna and swordfish
Deep sets
Sharks, Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary: Longlines were set at depths greater than 100m using weighted lines to reduce bycatch of recreationally important fish species and protected species such as seabirds and sea turtles. While bigeye tuna catch rates were consistent between control and experimental sets, bycatch rates increased for sickle pomfret and opah but decreased for wahoo, dolphinfish, blue and striped marlin, and shortbill species. These species are generally not targeted but retained for their commercial value. Bycatch of sharks and pelagic stingrays did not differ between the experimental and control sets.
Effect on Bycatch: No differences in catches between experimental and control sets
Reference:
Beverly, S., D. Curran, M. Musyl, and B. Molony., 2008 , Effects of eliminating shallow hooks from tuna longline sets on target and non-target species in the Hawaii-based pelagic tuna fishery

Gulf of Maine, United States

Hooks and Lines
N/A
Electromagnetic deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Squalus acanthias (Spiny dogfish) Field study in the wild
Summary:

A rare-earth metal alloy (cerium/lanthanide) was tested to determine if it could reduce bycatch of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) in longlines and rod and reel fisheries in the Gulf of Maine, United States. Laboratory and field trials showed no significant reduction in dogfish catch.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not significantly reduce dogfish catch
Reference:
Tallack, S.M.L. and J.W. Mandelman, 2009 , Do rare-earth metals deter spiny dogfish? A feasibility study on the use of electropositive "mischmetal" to reduce the bycatch of Squalus acanthias by hook gear in the Gulf of Maine

Alaska, United States

Hooks and Lines
Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis)
Electromagnetic deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Squalus acanthias (Spiny dogfish), Skates/Rays, Caliraja rhina (Longnose skate) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Rare earth metals (made of cerium mischmetal) were compared with control treatments of standard circle hooks and inert steel above circle hooks on longline fishing gear to determine if bycatch reduction of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) could be achieved. Results indicated a slight reduction in dogfish bycatch and a greater reduction in catch of longnose skate (Caliraja rhina) on hooks with mischmetal. Problems for using mischmetal commercially include its expense, hazardous nature, and rapid hydrolysis in seawater.

Effect on Bycatch: Slightly reduced bycatch of spiny dogfish and longnose skate
Reference:
Kaimmer, S. M., and A.W. Stoner., 2008 , Field investigation of rare-earth metal as a deterrent to spiny dogfish in the Pacific halibut fishery

North Carolina, USA

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Spanish mackerel and spot
Tensioning gillnet
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

The potential of modifying gillnets to reduce shark bycatch was investigated in the US Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus)  and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) gillnet fisheries. The modified net had larger floats on the head-rope and increased weight on the lead-line to increase the tension of the net. Results showed that the catch rate of some shark species was significantly reduced in the modified gillnets. Target catch rates of Spanish mackerel did not differ significantly between control and modified nets of the same mesh size.

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly reduced bycatch of some shark species
Reference:
Thorpe, T. and Frierson, D, 2009 , Bycatch mitigation assessment for sharks caught in coastal anchored gillnets

Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean

Surrounding nets and seine nets
Tuna (largely yellowfin (Thunnus albacares), skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), and bigeye (T. obesus)
Time area closures
Sharks, Carcharhinus falciformis (Silky shark) Summary study
Summary:

In the eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fishery, a large fraction of non-mammal bycatch is captured by purse-seine gear when nets are deployed around floating objects. The researchers examined the spatial distribution of a dominant species in this fishery’s bycatch, the silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), from 1994 to 2005 to determine whether spatial closures might effectively reduce the bycatch of this species. The researchers identified candidate locations for fishery closures that specifically considered the trade-off between bycatch reduction and the loss of tuna catch and evaluated ancillary conservation benefits to less commonly captured taxa. Smoothed spatial distributions of silky shark bycatch did not indicate persistent small areas of especially high bycatch for any size class of shark over the 12-year period. Nevertheless, bycatch of small silky sharks (<90 cm total length) was consistently higher north of the equator during all years. The researchers evaluated nearly 100 candidate closure areas between 5◦N and 15◦ N that could have reduced, by as much as 33%, the total silky shark bycatch while compromising only 12% of the tuna catch. Closures also suggested reductions in the bycatch of other vulnerable taxa, including other shark species and turtles. 

Effect on Bycatch: Candidate closure areas could have reduced total bycatch by as much as 33%
Reference:
Watson, J., T. Essington, C. Lennert-Cody, and M. Hall, 2008 , Trade-offs in the Design of Fishery Closures: Management of Silky Shark Bycatch in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Tuna Fishery

Northeastern Australia

Hooks and Lines
Bigeye and yellowfin tuna
Alternative leader design
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

Catch rates of blue marlin (Makaira nigricans), snake mackerel (Gempylus serpens), and sharks were lower when nylon monofilament leaders, instead of wire leaders, were used on pelagic longline gear, but bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) and black marlin (Makaira indica) catch rates increased. There was no effect on yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Nylon leaders also had higher bite-off rates than the wire leaders.

Effect on Bycatch: Wire leaders had higher catch rates of sharks when compared to nylon monofilament leaders
Reference:
Ward, P., Lawrence, E., Darbyshire, R. and Hindmarsh, S., 2008 , Large-scale experiment shows that nylon leaders reduce shark bycatch and benefit pelagic longline fisheries

North Pacific, Japan

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish
Circle hooks
Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

The use of circle hooks (4.3 sun and 5.2 sun) instead of standard Japanese tuna hooks (3.8 sun) in the pelagic longline fishery in the western North Pacific, had little impact on catch rates, mortality or size composition of blue sharks (Prionace glauca).

Effect on Bycatch: Little effect on catch rates, mortality or size composition
Reference:
Yokota, K., Kiyota, M., Minami, H., 2006 , Shark catch in pelagic longline fishery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks

Western Australia

Trawls
Red emperor (Lutjanus sebae), Scarlet sea perch (Lutjanus malabaricus), spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus), rankin cod (Epinephelus multinotatus), blue-spotted emperor (Lethrinus punctulatus), rosy threadfin bream (Nemipterus furcosus), others
Excluder devices
Elasmobranchs, Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary: A semi-flexible exclusion grid with a bar spacing of 15.5 cm reduced dolphin bycatch in the Pilbara trawl fishery by close to 50% and reduced the bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and rays. However, the fate of the dolphins that encountered the grid and escaped is unknown.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced capture of sharks larger than 100 cm with largest reductions occuring at lengths greater than 180 cm
Reference:
Stephenson, P.C., Wells, S., King, J.A., 2008 , Evaluation of exclusion grids to reduce the bycatch of dolphins, turtles, sharks and rays in the Pilbara trawl fishery

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in