Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 61 - 70 of 99
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

English Channel, United Kingdom

Hooks and Lines
None. Trials were conducted with a tourism operator.
Electromagnetic deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Prionace glauca (Blue shark) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Use of ferrite magnets did not act as a deterrent for blue shark (Prionace glauca) bait strikes. Time to strike, number of prior interactions, number of sharks present, and number of people in the water also did not influence bait strikes. 

Effect on Bycatch: Bait strike choices were not affected by prior interactions or other variables, such as number of sharks in the water.
Reference:
Lucas, S., Araujo, G., Bown, R.M.K., Johns, M., Matthews, S., Nicol, E., Parton, K.J., Rees, R., Scotts, G., Walker, V., Williams E., and P. Berggren, 2025 , Ferrite magnets do not deter blue sharks (Prionace glauca) from bait strikes in behavioral trials

Northern Levant Sea, Türkiye

Trawls
Shrimp (Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus)
Excluder devices
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Etmopterus spinax (Velvet belly lanternshark), Galeus melastomus (Blackmouth catshark), Sea Turtles, Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level) Field study in the wild
Summary:

 

40 trial tows investigated the potential of excluder grids in mitigating bycatch in trawl fisheries in the Northern Levant Sea. Tested gear configurations included a flexible grid with 50mm bar spacing and a rigid grid with 95mm spacing within the trawl extension. The excluder grids significantly reduced bycatch of several elasmobranch species including the velvet-belly lanternshark (Etmopterus spinax) and the blackmouth catshark (Galeus melastomus), as well as some species of bony fish. Sea turtle bycatch also appeared to be reduced although in general, sea turtle bycatch during the trials was low (two individuals in the control gear). However, catch performance of target shrimp species (Aristaeomorpha foliacea and Aristeus antennatus) were also reduced in the gear equipped with BRDs, indicating a trade-off. 

Effect on Bycatch: Etmopterus spinax - 50 mm grid - bycatch reduced by 45.3%; Galeus melastomus - 50 mm grid - bycatch reduced by 68.8%; Saurida lessepsianus - 95mm grid, bycatch reduced by 86.1%; Upeneus moluccensis - 95 mm grid, bycatch reduced by 28.4%
Reference:
Ersü, C.B., Yeldan, H., Kiyağı, V.B., Saygicak, S., Çınar, M., İşitmez, Y., Uzun, M., Çapkan, S., Dölek, A., and F. Çağlar , 2025 , Reduction and mitigation of the catch of elasmobranchs, sea turtles, and any other vulnerable marine species (e.g. marine mammals) incidentally captured by trawlers along the Turkish coast

Gulf of California, Mexico

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Variety of bony fish, including spotted sand bass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus) and California halibut ( Paralichthys californicus)
Visual deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Skates/Rays, Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Elasmobranch bycatch significantly decreased in bottom-set gillnets in the Gulf of California, Mexico using orange LEDs, ultraviolet LEDs, green LEDs, and green glow sticks, with orange LEDs being the most effective at reducing bycatch. As a whole, catch of bony fish was not affected by illumination, although responses were taxonomic-specific.  

Effect on Bycatch: Decrease in elasmobranch bycatch ranging from 24-55%, with orange LEDs most effective at reducing bycatch.
Reference:
Burgher KM, Wang J, Barkan J, Swimmer Y, Senko, JF, 2026 , Artificial light reduces elasmobranch bycatch in gillnets across multiple wavelengths and taxonomic groups.

Washington (United States West Coast)

Hooks and Lines
Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis)
Circle hooks

Hook size
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Squalus suckleyi (Pacific spiny dogfish), Bony Fishes, Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level), Sebastes ruberrimus (Yelloweye rockfish) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Hook appendages (16/0 size circle hooks modified with stiff wire extending from their shank at either a 22° or 45° angle in relation to the hooks’ offset and non-offset sides) have the potential to reduce yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) and Pacific spiny dogfish (Squalus suckleyi) bycatch in the U.S. West Coast Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) longline fishery. Hooks with a 45° appendage on the non-offset side caught significantly fewer rockfish, Pacific spiny dogfish, and smaller Pacific halibut without impacting legal-sized halibut catch. The appendages change the shape of the hook and greatly reduce the available opening for a fish’s mouth to engage with the hook, which may make it more difficult for fishes with vertical mouths (e.g., dogfish and rockfishes) than fish with horizontal mouths (e.g., halibut) to be caught using this method.  

Effect on Bycatch: Significant reduction in bycatch of rockfish, Pacific spiny dogfish and undersized Pacific halibut compared to control
Reference:
Heppell, D.S., Lomeli, M.J., Wakefield, W.W., Herrmann, B., Dykstra, C.L. and Stewart, I.J., 2026 , Hook modification to reduce rockfish and Pacific spiny dogfish bycatch in the U.S. West Coast Pacific halibut longline fishery

Florida, United States; Massachusetts; United States

Hooks and Lines
teleost fish (various)
Electromagnetic deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study tested whether a zinc/graphite galvanic electric field reduced capture of elasmobranchs in demersal and pelagic longline fisheries in Florida and Massachusetts (United States). The catch per unit effort of demersal sharks in Florida using the zinc/graphite treatment was significantly lower than the controls, with a 62.3-69.5% reduction in sharks caught on the zinc/graphite treatment. However, there was no difference in  demersal shark CPUE between treatments in Massachusetts. Too few sharks were captured in the pelagic longline trials to allow statistical comparison; however, capture of targeted bony fishes was greatest on hooks with the zinc/graphite treatment, suggesting no negative effect on target catch rates.  Additionally, there was an observed difference in efficacy of the zinc/graphite between Carcharhiniform sharks (more effective) and the Squaliform sharks (less effective), which suggests that the response to this deterrent may be species-specific. Further testing is needed to understand the limitations of the gear and efficacy for pelagic species. 

Effect on Bycatch: Significant reduction in catch of demersal shark species in Florida; no difference in Massachusetts
Reference:
Kajiura, S.M., Anderson, T.H., Smith, K.T., Peterson, C.T., Keller, B.A., and R.D. Grubbs, 2026 , Efficacy of a novel galvanic shark deterrent to reduce catch of elasmobranchs in longline fisheries

Italy, Mediterranean Sea

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius)
Alternative leader design

Artificial bait
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Prionace glauca (Blue shark), Juvenile or Non-target fishes (not always specified to species level) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study documents the performance of "trap-lines" used in place of traditional hook-based baits in the Mediterranean swordfish (Xiphias gladius) pelagic longline fishery. Trap-lines consist of concentric monofilament rings combined with artificial bait, and operate using entanglement, rather than hooking. Trap-lines were used on 30% of the fishing units, but accounted for about 51% of the marketable catch, with significantly higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) compared with conventional hooks. Landings per unit effort and median fork length were also larger for trap-lines. Additionally, 95% of non-target catch was associated with standard hooks. These early findings highlight the potential of trap lines to increase fishing efficiency, improve size selectivity, and significantly reduce bycatch in the Mediterranean swordfish fishery. 

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly less bycatch compared with traditional hooks
Reference:
Tiralongo, F., Giovannelli, F., Zembetti, A., DiMichino, B., Baiata, P., and Pignalosa, P. , 2026 , Trap-Line: An Innovative Fishing Gear for Mediterranean Swordfish Fisheries

Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Eastern Shore Laboratory, United States

N/A
Electromagnetic deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Carcharhinus plumbeus (Sandbar shark) Study in the lab
Summary:

Tests with captive, as well as wild, juvenile sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus) were undertaken to determine the effectiveness of electropositive metals in reducing the interactions with longline gear.  Electropositive metals deterred feeding in groups of captive juvenile sharks for a short period of time and altered the swimming patterns of individuals when food motivation was not present.  In the field, electropositive metals placed within 10 cm of the bottom longline hooks reduced the catch of sandbar sharks by around two thirds, compared to the catch on hooks with a placebo.

Effect on Bycatch: Electropositive metals deterred feeding in groups of captive juvenile sharks for a short period of time and altered the swimming patterns of individuals when food motivation was not present.
Reference:
Brill, R., Bushnell, P., Smith, L., Speaks, C., Sundaram, R., Stroud, E. and Wang, J., 2009 , The repulsive and feeding-deterrent effects of electropositive metals on juvenile sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus)

Virginia, United States

Hooks and Lines
N/A
Electromagnetic deterrents
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Carcharhinus plumbeus (Sandbar shark) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Tests with captive, as well as wild, juvenile sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus) were undertaken to determine the effectiveness of electropositive metals in reducing the interactions with longline gear.  Electropositive metals deterred feeding in groups of captive juvenile sharks for a short period of time and altered the swimming patterns of individuals when food motivation was not present.  In the field, electropositive metals placed within 10 cm of the bottom longline hooks reduced the catch of sandbar sharks by around two thirds, compared to the catch on hooks with a placebo.

Effect on Bycatch: Electropositive metals placed within 10 cm of the bottom longline hooks reduced the catch of sandbar sharks by around two thirds, compared to the catch on hooks with a placebo.
Reference:
Brill, R., Bushnell, P., Smith, L., Speaks, C., Sundaram, R., Stroud, E. and Wang, J., 2009 , The repulsive and feeding-deterrent effects of electropositive metals on juvenile sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus)

Northern Australia

Trawls
Prawns
Excluder devices
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Carcharhinus dussumieri (Whitecheek shark), Carcharhinus tilstoni (Australian blacktip shark), Skates/Rays, Anoxypristis cuspidata (Narrow sawfish), Gymnura australis (Australian butterfly ray), Himantura toshi (Brown whipray), Rhynchobatus djiddensis (Giant guitarfish) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The catches from five experimental trawls (TED + fisheye BRD, upward facing TED, downward facing TED, bigeye BRD and square-mesh panel BRD) were compared to those of the standard twin Florida Flyer prawn trawl. Nets with a combination of a TED and BRD reduced sea turtle catches by 100%, large sponges by 85.3%, sharks by 36.3% and rays by 17.7% and reduced the proportion of soft and damaged prawns by 41.6% and catches of tiger prawns by 6.5%. Upward and downward facing TEDs reduced sea turtle bycatch by 99% and 100% respectively and large sponges by 81.6% and 95.9% respectively. Catches of tiger prawns (P. semisulcatus and P. esculentus) were reduced by 6.3% with the use of TEDs. The BRDs had little impact on the catch of either target or bycatch species.

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly fewer sharks caught using TED+BRD, TED, BRD only; significant reduction in rays in TED+BRD and TED only compared with control; significant reduction in sawfish catch in nets with a TED. Less reduction in bycatch for small sharks and rays.
Reference:
Brewer, D., Heales, D., Milton, D., Dell, Q., Fry, G., Venables, B., Jones, P., 2006 , The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery

Florida, United States

Hooks and Lines
Red grouper (Epinephelus morio), Red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), other reef fish
Hook size
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae (Atlantic sharpnose shark), Squalus acanthias (Spiny dogfish) Field study in the wild
Summary:

This study evaluated the impacts of hook size on catch of discards of reef in the bottom longline fishery in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Larger 15/0 hooks successfully reduced primary target species (red grouper, Epinephelus morio) discards by 38% in comparison to 13/0 hooks, but decreased catch of other important species, including red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus). 15/0 hooks also significantly reduced catch rates of Atlantic sharpnose shark (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae) and spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). 

Effect on Bycatch: 15/0 hooks significantly reduced catch rates of Atlantic sharpnose shark and spiny dogfish
Reference:
Lee, M., Neidig, C.L., Schloesser, R., 2026 , Impacts of hook size on catch and bycatch in the eastern Gulf of Mexico reef fishery using electronic monitoring

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Current page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in