Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 31 - 40 of 50
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

N/A

N/A
Acoustic deterrent devices

Passive acoustic deterrents
Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pinnipeds Summary study
Summary:

A summary study of acoustic methods used to reduce or eliminate marine mammal entanglements was conducted. The authors found little evidence on the effectiveness of the use of sound to reduce or eliminate marine mammal incidental capture. Substantial decreases in cetacean bycatch, due to the use of passive methods such as increasing fishing net reflectivity, were not evident through comparisons of catch rates in commercial fisheries or from observational deterrence studies. Net alarms have been shown to greatly reduce whale entrapment in Canadian fish traps but similar success has not been shown in reducing small cetacean bycatch in many gillnet fisheries. Few controlled studies on the use of sound to reduce or eliminate marine mammal interactions have been conducted. There is a need to additional basic research on echolocation behavior and behavioral interactions between marine mammals and fisheries.

Effect on Bycatch: Net alarms do not appear ver effective in reducing small cetacean entanglements in gillnets
Reference:
Jefferson, T.A. and B.E. Curry, 1996 , Acoustic methods of reducing or eliminating marine mammal-fishery interactions: do they work?

Ireland

Hooks and Lines
Pollock (Pollachius pollachius)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal) Field study in the wild
Summary:

 Preliminary field studies were carried out on a potentially cetacean-friendly acoustic deterrent system for seals (played using underwater loudspeakers). The “smart seal deterrent signal” produces a startle response in seals rather than an aversion to a very loud noise, and is transmitted at a sound level which is not harmful to seals, even at very close distances. There was some evidence that the acoustic deterrent was effective at deterring gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) from fishing operations, although there was a low seal interaction rate regardless of whether the device was on or not. 

Effect on Bycatch: Apparent decrease in interactions
Reference:
M. Gosch, C. Luck, R. Cosgrove, T.Goetz, P. Tyndell, M. Cronin , 2017 , Development of acoustic deterrent device to mitigate seal fisheries interactions: interim report

Finland

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A Pinnipeds, Pusa saimensis (Saimaa ringed seal) Summary study
Summary:

This study analyzes the impacts of annual temporal fishing closures of gillnet fisheries in Lake Saimaa, Finland on bycatch/recovery of the Saimaa ringed seal (Pusa saimensis) population from 1991-2021. Results show that  fishing was responsible for 26% of observed mortality and 90% of that was from gillnet entanglement, but most bycatch mortalities are likely not observed and therefore underestimated. Longer temporal coverage of annual closures would improve juvenile survival, but the coverage may be regionally adequate. 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Jounela, P., Auttila, M., Alakoski, R., Niemi, M., Kunnasranta, M. , 2024 , Effects of fishing restrictions on the recovery of the endangered Saimaa ringed seal (Pusa hispida saimensis) population

Baltic Sea, Germany

Traps
N/A
Gear modification: Other
Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal) Summary study
Summary:

This paper reports on an unusual mortality event (UME) of healthy, nourished, male Baltic grey seals (Halichoerus grypus grypus) that occurred in the Greifswald Bay at the German Baltic coast in autumn 2017. Findings suggest that the cause of death was bycatch in a fyke net, despite the grey seals being a legally protected species. As a result, the fisheries authority ultimately established precautionary provisions, and fyke nets in Greifswald Bay are now (since 2020) required to have an entrance opening size of no greater than 75cm in circumference, which seems to have been effective to prevent gray seal bycatch in the area. However, gray seal bycatch in other areas continues, suggesting the need for more widespread adoption of preventative provisions. 

 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Westphal, L., von Vietinghoff, V., Moritz, T., von Nordheim, H., Schaarschmidt, T., Teifke, J.P., Wohlsein, P., Piroch, I., Harder, T., König, P., Höper, D., Benke, H. and Dähne, M. , 2025 , By-Catch of Grey Seals in Fish Traps in the German Baltic Sea—From Incidents to Mitigation and Fisheries Regulation

San Matías Gulf, Argentina

Trawls
N/A Pinnipeds, Otaria byronia (South American sea lion) Summary study
Summary:

The authors used onboard observers and fishing records to evaluate marine mammal bycatch in trawl fisheries of the San Matías Gulf, Argentina. Results show that of 46 incidentally caught species, the American sea lion (Otaria byronia) was caught most frequently, and that catch was associated with proximity to colonies and the target species identity. Significantly higher bycatch rates were observed in the hake (Merluccius hubbsi) fleet.

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Romero, M.A., Flórez, L., Reinaldo, M.O., Machado, R., Coller, M. and Crespo, E.A., 2025 , Bycatch in the balance: the trawl fisheries impact on South American sea lions in San Matias Gulf, with comments on other species

United Kingdom

NA Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal), Phoca vitulina (Harbor seal) Summary study
Summary:

The authors evaluated factors influencing marine mammal bycatch in static net fishing operations in the UK between 1996 and 2023. Since 2014, harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)  bycatch has been decreasing while common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) bycatch has been increasing; grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) and harbour seal  (Phoca vitulina) bycatch has been increasing gradually across the time period. Influential factors included seasonal patterns, water depth, and level of fishing effort. 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: NA
Reference:
Moyes, F., Smout, S., Thomas, L., Kingston, A. and Northridge, S., 2025 , Factors associated with bycatch of marine mammals in United Kingdom static net fisheries

Falkland Islands

Trawls
Patagonian squid (Doryteuthis gahi)
Excluder devices
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Seal exclusion devices (SEDs) are effective in reducing pinniped bycatch in the Patagonian squid fishery, however, drowning may still occur during trawl hauling. 

Effect on Bycatch: 0.91% of seals over 12 fishing seasons were caught in trawls with SEDs, with a survival rate of 89.5%. SED mortalities were attributed to drowning from blockages in the SED or entanglement in the trawl. Faster hauling speeds may also increase bycatch.
Reference:
Iriarte, V. and A. Winter , 2025 , Disentangling pinniped incidental mortality in a bottom-trawl fishery with seal exclusion devices

United Kingdom

NA
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal), Phoca vitulina (Harbor seal) Summary study
Summary:

An analysis of records of static net bycatch sampling in the United Kingdom from 1996-2023 found that use of acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) reduced harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch per haul (BpH) to 0.23 of the background rate. BpH increased for harbor seals and grey seals (Phoca vitulina and Halichoerus gryphus) when ADDs were used. Current efforts to reduce harbor porpoise bycatch may be increasing seal mortality in the same fisheries. 

Effect on Bycatch: Use of acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) reduced harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch per haul (BpH) but increased bycatch of harbor seals and grey seals (Phoca vitulina and Halichoerus gryphus)
Reference:
Moyes, F., Smout, S., Thomas, L., Kingston, A., and S. Northridge, 2025 , Factors associated with bycatch of marine mammals in United Kingdom static net fisheries

Tasmania, Australia

Trawls
Blue grenadier (Macruronus novaezelandiae)
Excluder devices
Pinnipeds, Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus (Australian fur seal) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Several designs of seal exclusion devices (SEDs) were tested to reduce bycatch of Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) in the winter blue grenadier (Macruronus novaezelandiae) trawl fishery. A 'top-hatch' SED, or one with a top-mounted escape hatch, resulted in the lowest occurrence of seal bycatch than any other SED design or than nets without a SED. The SED prevented entry into the net codend where drownings occurred. SEDs also successfully expelled seals and limited access into the net via the escape hatch. Cameras are needed to verify the results.

Effect on Bycatch: A 'top-hatch' SED resulted in the lowest occurrence of seal bycatch than any other SED design or than nets without a SED. The SED prevented entry into the net codend where drownings occurred.
Reference:
Tilzey, R., S. Goldsworthy, M. Cawthorn, N. Calvert, D. Hamer, S. Russell, P. Shaughnessy, B. Wise, and C. Stewardson, 2006 , Assessment of seal-fishery interactions in the winter blue grenadier fishery off west Tasmania and the development of fishing practices and Seal Exclusion Devices to mitigate seal bycatch by factory trawlers

Australia

Traps
Rock lobster (Panulirus cygnus) Pinnipeds, Arctocephalus forsteri (New Zealand fur seal, kekeno), Neophoca cinerea (Australian sea lion) Summary study
Summary:

This study aimed to quantify the risks to Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) and New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) populations from bycatch in a trap (rock lobster, Panulirus cygnus) and demersal gillnet fishery off South Australia. The approach was to: (1) estimate the spatial distribution of foraging effort for different sex and age classes within each species; (2) compare these with the spatial distribution of fishing effort in order to develop spatial estimates of seal-fishery interaction probabilities; (3) undertake population viability analyses to identify the levels of bycatch that would place subpopulations of each species into different risk categories; and (4) examine different bycatch scenarios and identify subpopulations, regions and marine fishing areas with the greatest bycatch risk. Results suggest that the risk of subpopulation extinction, even from low levels of bycatch, was high for sea lions, but very low for fur seals and that the two fisheries lend themselves to different mitigation approaches: gear modification in the lobster fishery, and spatial management of fishing effort in the demersal gillnet fishery.

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Goldsworthy, S.D., Page, B., 2007 , A risk-assessment approach to evaluating the significance of seal bycatch in two Australian fisheries

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Current page 4
  • Page 5
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in