Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 31 - 40 of 141
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Balearic Islands, Spain

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Red mullet (Mullus barbatus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The experiment tested the effects of Aquamark 100 pingers on the depredation rate of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) on trammel nets. Results showed nets equipped with pingers had 87% fewer holes (attributed to damage by dolphins) than nets without pingers.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) depredation
Reference:
Gazo, M., Gonzalvo, ,J. and A. Aguilar, 2008 , Pingers as deterrents of bottlenose dolphins interacting with trammel nets

North Carolina, USA

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Mixed
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors tested the behavioral response of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to gill nets equipped with active and control Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers. Although dolphins were observed significantly fewer times within a 100m circular buffer zone from the alarms, overall results showed no significant differences in the number of groups observed, or closest approaches by animals to the net, between active and control periods.

Effect on Bycatch: No difference on group size or closest approach to the net between active and control pingers
Reference:
Cox, T.M, Read, A.J., Swanner, D., Urian, K. and D. Waples, 2004 , Behavioral responses of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, to gillnets and acoustic alarms

Türkiye

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Gillnets fitted with Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers had significantly less bycatch of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) than control nets and the fish size and catch rates of the target species were not affected.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced harbor porpoise interactions with gillnet
Reference:
Göener, S., Bilgin, S., 2009 , The effect of pingers on harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena bycatch and fishing effort in the turbot gill net fishery in the Turkish Black Sea coast

Western Australia

Trawls
Red emperor (Lutjanus sebae), Scarlet sea perch (Lutjanus malabaricus), spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus), rankin cod (Epinephelus multinotatus), blue-spotted emperor (Lethrinus punctulatus), rosy threadfin bream (Nemipterus furcosus), others
Excluder devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary: A semi-flexible exclusion grid with a bar spacing of 15.5 cm reduced dolphin bycatch in the Pilbara trawl fishery by close to 50% and reduced the bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and rays. However, the fate of the dolphins that encountered the grid and escaped is unknown.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced dolphin bycatch by almost 50% and reduced bycatch of sea turtles, large sharks and large rays
Reference:
Stephenson, P.C., Wells, S., King, J.A., 2008 , Evaluation of exclusion grids to reduce the bycatch of dolphins, turtles, sharks and rays in the Pilbara trawl fishery

Akaroa Harbour, New Zealand

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
None reported
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Cephalorhynchus hectori (Hector's dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

White Dukane pingers with a fundamental frequency of 10kHz and harmonies of up to 160 kHz, elicited the strongest response from Hector's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus hectori), compared to the black Pice and red Dukane pingers. More than half (62.5%) of the dolphins exhibited avoidance when exposed to the white pinger. However, no significant differences between pingers were found in the rate of echolocation clicks per dolphin or dolphin group, or among the peak frequencies of subset clicks.

Effect on Bycatch: 62.5% of individuals elicited avoidance behavior (using white Dukane pingers)
Reference:
Stone, G.S., Cavagnaro, L., Hutt, A., Kraus, S., Baldwin, K., Brown, J., 2000 , Reactions of Hector's dolphins to acoustic gillnet pingers

North Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Gillnets from the North Sea wreck net fishery equipped with pingers had a 100% reduction in the bycatch of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) compared to nets with no pingers attached.

Effect on Bycatch: 100% reduction in harbor porpoise bycatch
Reference:
Larsen, F., Vinther, M., Krog, C. , 2002 , Use of pingers in the Danish North Sea wreck net fishery

North Sea

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Bottom set gillnets with pingers (LU-1, 8 signals, 145 dB, 300 ms, random signal intervals) attached were tested against standard nets and nets with dummy pingers (double blind) to determine if they could reduce the incidental capture of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). The proportion (number of nets with porpoises/number without) of harbour porpoise bycatch was reduced from 0.00229 and 0.00295 for nets with dummy pingers and no pingers respectively, to 0.00015 for nets with active pingers. The difference in bycatch rates between nets with active and dummy pingers was statistically significant but not between nets with dummy pingers and with no pingers.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced catch rates from 0.00229 and 0.00295 for nets with dummy pingers and no pingers respectively, to 0.00015 for nets with active pingers
Reference:
Larsen, F., 1999 , The effect of acoustic alarms on the by-catch of harbour porpoises in the Danish North Sea gill net fishery

British Columbia, Canada

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Salmon Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Summary study
Summary:

Small cetaceans are by-caught in salmon gillnet fisheries in British Columbia (BC) waters. In Canada, there is currently no generic calculation to identify when management action is necessary to reduce cetacean bycatch below sustainable limits. The researchers estimated potential anthropogenic mortality limits for harbour (Phocoena phocoena) and Dall’s (Phocoenoides dalli) porpoises and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) using quantitative objectives from two well-established frameworks for conservation and management (the United States’ Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas), which are similar to some management objectives developed for marine mammal stocks elsewhere in Canada. Limits were calculated as functions of (i) a minimum abundance estimate (2004–2005); (ii) maximum rate of population increase; and (iii) uncertainty factors to account for bias in abundance estimates and uncertainty in mortality estimates. Best estimates of bycatch mortality in 2004 and 2005 exceeded only the most precautionary limits and only for porpoise species. Future research priority should be given to determining small cetacean stock structure in BC and refining species-specific entanglement rates in these and other fisheries. The approach offers a quantitative framework for Canada to meet its stated objectives to maintain favorable conservation status of cetacean populations.

Reference:
Williams, R., Hall, A., Winship, A., 2008 , Potential limits to anthropogenic mortality of small cetaceans in coastal waters of British Columbia

Scotland

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
N/A
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Authors investigated the spatial and temporal responses of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) to simulated bottom-set nets equipped with periodically operating Dukane NetMark 1000 pingers. Pinger sound significantly reduced the median echolocation encounter rate by 50-100% at detectors placed up to 500m and reduced the sighting rate up to 375m from the simulated net. The average distance of approach also increased. When pingers were silent after being active for about two days, the return time of porpoises increased by several hours in comparison to a control. After about 50 days, habituation to the pingers was detected at two of nine stations. Pingers may affect harbor porpoises at greater distances than previously observed, but alternative solutions should be applied in ecologically important habitats and migration routes. 

Effect on Bycatch: Pingers significantly reduced echolocation encounter rates by 50-100% at 500m; sighting reduced up to 375m. Porpoise return time was 6 hrs when pingers were silent after being active for 24 hrs 50 min
Reference:
Carlström J., Berggren P., Tregenza N.J.C, 2009 , Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises

Sardinia, Italy

fin-fish farm
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Acoustic harassment devices (AHDs) were tested in association with a marine fin-fish farm off the north-eastern coast of Sardinia, to determine their effectiveness on common bottlenose dolphins.  This was a controlled exposure experiment.  No significant or immediate effects on bottlenose dolphin presence, distance from AHD, group size or time spent in the fish farm area were caused by activation of the AHD. Thus, additional research is needed on their effectiveness in the marine environment before further deployment.

Effect on Bycatch: No significant effect on bottlenose dolphins' presence, distance from AHD, group size or time spent in the fish farm area

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Current page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in