Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 101 - 110 of 141
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Gulf of California, Mexico

N/A Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena sinus (Vaquita) Summary study
Summary:

This review paper reflects on the past 50 years of efforts to save the vaquita (Phocoena sinus) from extinction, with the primary threat being lethal bycatch in gillnets set for the totoaba fish (Totoaba macdonaldi) in the upper Gulf of California. Both the conservation goals for the vaquita and the economic and social goals for the local fisheries have consistently failed to meet stakeholder expectations, and the vaquita population has continued to decline. The authors call for an "immediate and definitive decision" preserve the vaquita and aid sustainable fisheries in the region. 

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
del Monte‐Luna, P., Lluch‐Cota, S.E., Trites, A.W., Cisneros‐Montemayor, A., Arreguín‐Sánchez, F. and Alcántara‐Razo, E., 2025 , The Vanishing Vaquita: A Call for Definitive Action

New Caledonia

Hooks and Lines
Tuna Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Summary study
Summary:

The authors performed modeling on 10 years of logbook data to analyze environmental and operational factors that influence shark and odontocete depredation in the New Caledonian longline tuna fishery. Results suggest that there are "hotspots" of odontocete depredation, and that it is driven by environmental factors such as sea surface temperature and bathymetry, while shark depredation is driven by operational fisheries factors such as soaking time and number of hooks. Alterations such as reducing soaking time to under 12 hours, or setting limits on hooks to <1,750, could significantly reduce the likelihood of depredation. 

 

Effect on Bycatch: NA
Reference:
Mollier, M., Derville, S., Mazé, C., Virgili, A., Lerebourg, C., Prioul, F., Hamer, P., Hosken, M., McKechnie, S. and Tixier, P., 2025 , Both environmental conditions and fisher behaviour influence the occurrence of shark and odontocete depredation on the longline catch in New Caledonia

Bay of Biscay

Trawls
Hake (Merluccius merluccius), blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou), mackerel (Scomber scombrus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors evaluated the effectiveness of DDD®03H Dolphin Dissuasive Devices, or DDD pingers (an acoustic deterrent device) to reduce common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) bycatch in a demersal pair trawler in the Bay of Biscay. Results showed that the DDD pingers reduced common dolphin bycatch by more than 90%, and that common dolphin bycatch in this trawl fishery is related to fishing zone and depth, but not necessarily factors such as time of day and haul duration.

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: Significantly reduced bycatch of common dolphin, both by frequency and number of individuals per haul
Reference:
Puente, E., Citores, L., Cuende, E., Krug, I. and Basterretxea, M., 2023 , Bycatch of short-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) in the pair bottom trawl fishery of the Bay of Biscay and its mitigation with an active acoustic deterrent device (pinger)

Peru

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Unspecified Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena spinipinnis (Burmeister's porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The authors performed onboard surveys (line transects and passive acoustic monitoring) and interviewed gillnet fishers to assess abundance and bycatch of the endemic Burmeister’s porpoises (Phocoena spinipinnis) in northern Peru in 2023. The population abundance in the study area was estimated at 1,696 spatially distributed individuals, with the highest densities found within 25km of shore and within shallow waters ≤50 m. Fishers' descriptions of bycatch aligned with survey results, and most fishers reported experiencing porpoise bycatch the previous year. The annual bycatch rate was estimated to be 420 porpoises across the entire artisanal gillnet fishery of Salaverry, which far exceeds sustainable limits and highlights the urgent need for bycatch mitigation measures.

 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: N/A
Reference:
Ortiz-Alvarez, C., Ortés-Villauriz, R., Mangel, J.C., Alfaro-Shigueto, J. and Heinrich, S., 2025 , Concurrent bycatch and population assessments of Burmeister’s porpoises in northern Peru reveal unsustainable levels of mortality

United Kingdom

NA Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked common dolphin), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal), Phoca vitulina (Harbor seal) Summary study
Summary:

The authors evaluated factors influencing marine mammal bycatch in static net fishing operations in the UK between 1996 and 2023. Since 2014, harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)  bycatch has been decreasing while common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) bycatch has been increasing; grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) and harbour seal  (Phoca vitulina) bycatch has been increasing gradually across the time period. Influential factors included seasonal patterns, water depth, and level of fishing effort. 

 

 

Effect on Bycatch: NA
Reference:
Moyes, F., Smout, S., Thomas, L., Kingston, A. and Northridge, S., 2025 , Factors associated with bycatch of marine mammals in United Kingdom static net fisheries

United Kingdom

NA
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise), Pinnipeds, Halichoerus grypus atlantica (Gray seal), Phoca vitulina (Harbor seal) Summary study
Summary:

An analysis of records of static net bycatch sampling in the United Kingdom from 1996-2023 found that use of acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) reduced harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch per haul (BpH) to 0.23 of the background rate. BpH increased for harbor seals and grey seals (Phoca vitulina and Halichoerus gryphus) when ADDs were used. Current efforts to reduce harbor porpoise bycatch may be increasing seal mortality in the same fisheries. 

Effect on Bycatch: Use of acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) reduced harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch per haul (BpH) but increased bycatch of harbor seals and grey seals (Phoca vitulina and Halichoerus gryphus)
Reference:
Moyes, F., Smout, S., Thomas, L., Kingston, A., and S. Northridge, 2025 , Factors associated with bycatch of marine mammals in United Kingdom static net fisheries

Iceland

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Three types of acoustic deterrent devices were tested in the Icelandic cod gillnet fishery: Fishtek Banana pingers, Porpoise ALert devices (PAL), and wideband PAL (wPAL) with a modified pinger signal (PAL device emitting a wideband pinger signal with a frequency range of 20 – 160 kHz and signal duration of 0.3 s (every 4–30 s) with the same source level at 145 db and maximum depth (320 m)). Banana pingers and PALs did not demonstrate any reduction of bycatch of marine mammals, while the wPAL-equipped nets had no bycatch during the trial. Fish catch and overall commercial value was significantly reduced in gillnets equipped with banana pingers and PALs.  

Effect on Bycatch: Use of banana pingers and porpoise alert devices (PALs) had roughly the same rates of bycatch as the control, while wideband PALs did not record any marine mammal bycatch (control = 14 marine mammals).
Reference:
Jusufovski, D. and Sigurðsson, G.M., 2026 , First trials of commercially available pingers for cetacean bycatch reduction in Icelandic bottom set gillnet fishery

Karachi, Pakistan

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Tuna spp.
Sub-surface sets (gillnets)
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

The study examined individual and cumulative bycatch during the first five years of a fisher engagement program in the tuna drift gillnet fishery in Pakistan, where fishers co-developed a sub-surface net setting strategy while also receiving bycatch awareness and safe release training. Captain identity and year were the strongest predictors of sea turtle and dolphin bycatch rates.  

Effect on Bycatch: 95% reduction in cumulative dolphin bycatch over four years; 90% reduction in cumulative sea turtle bycatch
Reference:
Roberson, L.A., Razzaque, S.A., Elliott, B., Nawaz, R., Shiekh, A. and Read, A.J., 2026 , Successful fisher-driven reduction of megafauna bycatch in a tuna gillnet fishery

Western Baltic Sea (ICES SD22)

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), flounder (Platichthys flesus), dab (Limanda limanda) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) Field study in the wild
Summary:

The PearlNet aims to mitigate odontocete bycatch in bottom-set gillnets by enhancing the acoustic visibility of nets through the incorporation of small, acrylic glass spheres. This study found that PearlNet performed similarly to standard nets in terms of catch efficiency and handling time of gear. Performance of the gear in reducing marine mammal bycatch was not assessed during this study, however, no mammal bycatch was reported. 

Effect on Bycatch: Not tested (but none observed during study)
Reference:
Milanelli, A.M., Santos, J., Noack. T., Berzosa, S.A., Schartmann, H., Kindt-Larsen, L., Lichtenstein, U., Herr, H., Stepputtis, D. , 2026 , PearlNet performance: Catch efficiency and practicality of a potential odontocete bycatch reduction tool in set net fisheries

Black Sea, Bulgaria

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
Acoustic deterrent devices
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Between 2019 and 2022, trials using three different pinger models (Future Oceans 10 kHz, Future Oceans 70 kHz, and PAL Wideband) were conducted in Bulgaria during standard turbot (Scophthalmus maeoticus) fishing operations. Marine mammal bycatch was observed in  61% of all hauls. No significant difference in bycatch rates between active and control nets was observed in trials involving Future Oceans 10 kHz (17 trials) and 70 kHz (6 trials) pingers. However, a significant reduction (74%) in cetacean bycatch was recorded during the trials conducted with PAL Wideband pingers. 

Effect on Bycatch: Future Oceans 10kHz and Future Oceans 70kHz pingers did not significantly impact bycatch; PAL Wideband resulted in a 74% reduction in cetacean bycatch
Reference:
Popov, D., Meshkova, G., Dimitrov, H., Panayotova, M. , 2026 , Can pingers mitigate the bycatch of the endangered Black Sea harbour porpoise?

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Current page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in