Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black Sea, Bulgaria |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Between 2019 and 2022, trials using three different pinger models (Future Oceans 10 kHz, Future Oceans 70 kHz, and PAL Wideband) were conducted in Bulgaria during standard turbot (Scophthalmus maeoticus) fishing operations. Marine mammal bycatch was observed in 61% of all hauls. No significant difference in bycatch rates between active and control nets was observed in trials involving Future Oceans 10 kHz (17 trials) and 70 kHz (6 trials) pingers. However, a significant reduction (74%) in cetacean bycatch was recorded during the trials conducted with PAL Wideband pingers. Future Oceans 10kHz and Future Oceans 70kHz pingers did not significantly impact bycatch; PAL Wideband resulted in a 74% reduction in cetacean bycatch |
Torres and Passo de Torres, Brazil |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Not specified |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) | Field study in the wild | This study evaluated the effectiveness of using plastic drink bottles as low-cost acoustic reflectors to reduce franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) bycatch in bottom-set trammel nets and gillnets off of southern Brazil. The bottles achieved an 88% reduction in dolphin bycatch per unit effort compared to control nets. In addition, the bottles had no significant impact on commercial target species catch (by weight). 88% reduction in franciscana dolphin bycatch |
Menai Bay, Zanzibar, Tanzania |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Large pelagic finfish (primarily Euthynnus affinis, Katsuwonus pelamis, Istiophorus platypterus, Makaira indica, Xiphias gladius, and Scomberomorus commerson) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops aduncus (Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | The study tested the use of glass and plastic drink bottles as low-cost bycatch mitigation devices (mechanical pingers and acoustic reflectors, respectively) in gillnet fisheries across three regions/fisheries: surface-set driftnet fisheries in Zanzibar and Peru and bottom-set trammel net fisheries in Brazil. In Brazil, plastic bottles reduced dolphin bycatch while increasing fish catch, although further trials are needed. In Peru, glass bottles had no effect on dolphin, porpoise, or turtle bycatch but altered target elasmobranch and teleost catches; plastic bottles similarly had no effect on dolphin bycatch but increased shark catch. In Zanzibar, no dolphin bycatch was recorded in any sets, though plastic bottles increased tuna catch. |
Salaverry, Peru |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Elasmobranchs, dolphinfish (Coryphaena sp.), billfish (Xiphias sp.), and bonito (Sarda sp.) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Lagenorhynchus obscurus (Dusky dolphin), Phocoena spinipinnis (Burmeister's porpoise), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin) | Field study in the wild | The study tested the use of glass and plastic drink bottles as low-cost bycatch mitigation devices (mechanical pingers and acoustic reflectors, respectively) in gillnet fisheries across three regions/fisheries: surface-set driftnet fisheries in Zanzibar and Peru and bottom-set trammel net fisheries in Brazil. In Brazil, plastic bottles reduced dolphin bycatch while increasing fish catch, although further trials are needed. In Peru, glass bottles had no effect on dolphin, porpoise, or turtle bycatch but altered target elasmobranch and teleost catches; plastic bottles similarly had no effect on dolphin bycatch but increased shark catch. In Zanzibar, no dolphin bycatch was recorded in any sets, though plastic bottles increased tuna catch. No significant difference between control and glass and control and plastic bottles |
Torres and Passo de Torres, Brazil |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Brazilian flounder (Paralichtys spp.) and whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri) |
Acoustic deterrent devices
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Tursiops truncatus (Bottlenose dolphin), Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) | Field study in the wild | The study tested the use of glass and plastic drink bottles as low-cost bycatch mitigation devices (mechanical pingers and acoustic reflectors, respectively) in gillnet fisheries across three regions/fisheries: surface-set driftnet fisheries in Zanzibar and Peru and bottom-set trammel net fisheries in Brazil. In Brazil, plastic bottles reduced dolphin bycatch while increasing fish catch, although further trials are needed. In Peru, glass bottles had no effect on dolphin, porpoise, or turtle bycatch but altered target elasmobranch and teleost catches; plastic bottles similarly had no effect on dolphin bycatch but increased shark catch. In Zanzibar, no dolphin bycatch was recorded in any sets, though plastic bottles increased tuna catch. No dolphins caught as bycatch in sets using plastic bottles, compared to four in the control (sample size too small to generate significance) |
San Clemente del Tuyu, Argentina |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Striped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa), whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri) |
Metal oxide/barium sulfate nets
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) | Field study in the wild | Experimental trials were carried out in Argentina comparing franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) bycatch rates in standard gillnets with gillnets with increased acoustic reglectivity by infusion with barium sulphate (BaSO4) and increased flexural stiffness of the nylon twine. There was no significant difference in franciscana bycatch rates or target catch rates among the three net types. |
San Clemente del Tuyu, Argentina |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Striped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa), whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri) |
Stiff gillnet
|
Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Pontoporia blainvillei (Franciscana dolphin) | Field study in the wild | Experimental trials were carried out in Argentina comparing franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) bycatch rates in standard gillnets with gillnets with increased acoustic reglectivity by infusion with barium sulphate (BaSO4) and increased flexural stiffness of the nylon twine. There was no significant difference in franciscana bycatch rates or target catch rates among the three net types. |
Northeast Atlantic |
N/A | Mammals, Large Cetaceans (maximum length > 7.5 meters), Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) | Summary study | Potential risk of fisheries to cetaceans was assessed using a screening procedure based on a Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) using gears found in Ireland. Gillnets targeting demersal species was assessed as the fishery posing the greatest risk to cetaceans. Pelagic trawls targeting small pelagic species was found to pose a moderate risk to cetaceans. Specific gear-species interactions were also identified, such as humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and pots/traps. |
||
Mauritania, Northwest Africa |
Trawls
|
Sardinella (Sardinella aurita, Sardinella maderensis), sardine, horse mackerel |
Excluder devices
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Sphyrna lewini (Scalloped hammerhead), Sphyrna mokarran (Great hammerhead), Sphyrna zygaena (Smooth hammerhead), Skates/Rays, Manta birostris (Manta ray), Mammals, Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Sea Turtles, Bony Fishes, Mola mola (Ocean sunfish) | Field study in the wild | The addition of a prototype "tunnel excluder" consisting of a filter grid (inclined at ca. 20 degrees) that leads to an escape tunnel in the Mauritanian industrial trawl fishery nets achieved a 40-100% reduction in bycatch of vulnerable species, including allowing 100% of rays and turtles to escape, 75% of manta rays, 40% of billfish and between 20-75% of sharks to escape. Cetaceans were less likely to use the tunnel to escape due to the narrowness of the design. Prototype allowed 100% of rays and turtles to escape, 75% of manta rays, 40% of billfish and between 20-75% of sharks to escape |
British Columbia, Canada |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Salmon | Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters), Lagenorhynchus obliquidens (Pacific white-sided dolphin), Phocoenoides dalli (Dall's porpoise), Phocoena phocoena (Harbor porpoise) | Field study in the wild | Small cetaceans are by-caught in salmon gillnet fisheries in British Columbia (BC) waters. In Canada, there is currently no generic calculation to identify when management action is necessary to reduce cetacean bycatch below sustainable limits. The researchers estimated potential anthropogenic mortality limits for harbour (Phocoena phocoena) and Dall’s (Phocoenoides dalli) porpoises and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) using quantitative objectives from two well-established frameworks for conservation and management (the United States’ Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas), which are similar to some management objectives developed for marine mammal stocks elsewhere in Canada. Limits were calculated as functions of (i) a minimum abundance estimate (2004–2005); (ii) maximum rate of population increase; and (iii) uncertainty factors to account for bias in abundance estimates and uncertainty in mortality estimates. Best estimates of bycatch mortality in 2004 and 2005 exceeded only the most precautionary limits and only for porpoise species. Future research priority should be given to determining small cetacean stock structure in BC and refining species-specific entanglement rates in these and other fisheries. The approach offers a quantitative framework for Canada to meet its stated objectives to maintain favorable conservation status of cetacean populations. |