Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 11 - 20 of 102
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Azores, Portugal

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and blue shark (Prionace glauca)
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

There was no significant difference in the number of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) caught in the Azores (Portugal) longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and blue shark (Prionace glauca) fishery between straight 16/0, offset 16/0, and offset 18/0 circle hooks. Circle hooks decreased the rate of throat hooking in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) caught in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. Straight 16/0 circle hooks caught the most blue sharks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery, followed by offset 18/0 circle hooks. Offset 16/0 circle hooks caught the fewest blue sharks.

Effect on Bycatch: Decreased throat hooking
Reference:
Bolten, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2004 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 3

Azores, Portugal

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and blue shark (Prionace glauca)
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

A Japanese tuna hook 3.6mm S/S caught significantly more loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) than non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks and caught more turtles in the throat than the circle hooks in the Azores (Portugal) longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and blue shark (Prionace glauca) fishery. Non-offset 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) than non-offset 16/0 circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery. There was no significant difference in the number of blue sharks caught on non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks in the Azores longline swordfish and blue shark fishery.

Effect on Bycatch: Non-offset 16/0 and 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer turtles than Japanese tuna hook. Non-offset 18/0 circle hooks caught fewer turtles than non-offset 16/0
Reference:
Bolten, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2005 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores Phase 4

Azores, Portugal

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and blue shark (Prionace glauca)
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Circle hooks (non-offset 16/0 and 18/0) caught significantly more target blue sharks (Prionace glauca) than J hooks in the Azores (Portugal) longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery. There was no significant difference among the hook types tested in the number of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) caught, although J hooks had a significantly higher rate of throat capture compared with circle hooks. 

Effect on Bycatch: No significant difference in capture rate
Reference:
Bolten, A. and K. Bjorndal, 2002 , Experiment to Evaluate Gear Modification on Rates of Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Swordfish Longline Fishery in the Azores

Western Atlantic Ocean

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish and tuna
Dyed bait
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

Blue-dyed bait does not significantly reduce loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermocheles coriacea) sea turtle captures in the western Atlantic longline fishery.

Effect on Bycatch: Did not reduce bycatch
Reference:
Watson, J., D. Foster, S. Epperly, and A. Shah, 2002 , Experiments in the Western Atlantic Northeast Distant Waters to Evaluate Sea Turtle Mitigation Measures in the Pelagic Longline Fishery. Report on Experiments Conducted in 2001

Hawaii

Hooks and Lines
Bigeye tuna
Deep sets
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: Deep water setting techniques, tested on longline gear in Hawaii, reduced bycatch of sea turtles and striped marlin. Bycatch of target species, bigeye tuna, increased 1.27 times.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced bycatch

Hawaii, United States

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius), other pelagics
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii (U.S.)-based longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions.

Effect on Bycatch: Leatherback turtle capture rates declined by 83% and loggerhead capture rates declined by 90%
Reference:
Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell, and I. Kinan-Kelly, 2007 , Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery

Hawaii, United States

Hooks and Lines
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius), other pelagics
Circle hooks
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Demochelys coriacea (Leatherback sea turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

To reduce turtle interactions, regulations for the Hawaii (U.S.)-based longline swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery required vessels to switch from using a J-shaped hook with squid bait to a wider circle-shaped hook with fish bait. Analyses of observer data showed that, following the introduction of the regulations, significant and large reductions in sea turtle and shark capture rates occurred without compromising target species catches. There was also a highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks and a highly significant increase in the proportion of caught turtles that were released after removal of all terminal tackle. Research suggests that turtles aggregate at foraging grounds and that instituting methods to avoid real-time turtle bycatch hotspots may further reduce turtle interactions.

Effect on Bycatch: Highly significant reduction in the proportion of turtles that swallowed hooks
Reference:
Gilman, E., D. Kobayashi, T. Swenarton, N. Brothers, P. Dalzell, and I. Kinan-Kelly, 2007 , Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery

U.S. Mid-Atlantic

Dredge
Sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus)
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

In 2003 and 2004 the scallop industry, Coonamessett Farm, and the Virginia Institute of Marine Fisheries, with funding from the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service, successfully tested a series of chains that excluded turtles from entering the dredge bag. In twelve trials, divers videoed the results of placing turtle carcasses in the path of a modified scallop dredge. Turtle carcasses went over the dredge in all but three trials. Damage was assessed as “slight or none” in all valid assessments of damage to a carcass following an encounter.

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced serious injury
Reference:
Milliken, H.O., Belskis, L., DuPaul, W., Gearhart, J., Haas, H., Mitchell, J., Smolowitz, R. & Teas, W., 2007 , Evaluation of a modified scallop dredge's ability to reduce the likelihood of damage to loggerhead sea turtle carcasses

Chesapeake Bay, United States

Traps
Multiple species
Alternative leader design
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle) Field study in the wild
Summary:

An alternative leader design reduced loggerhead (Caretta caretta) sea turtle interactions in a Chesapeake Bay (U.S.) pound net fishery for finfish. There was no change in catch of weakfish (Cynoscion regalis), croaker (Micropogonias undulates), and harvestfish (Peprilus alepidotus).

Effect on Bycatch: Reduced interactions
Reference:
DeAlteris, J., R. Silva, E. Estey, K. Tesla, and T. Newcomb, 2005 , Performance in 2005 of an alternative leader design on the bycatch of sea turtles and the catch of finfish in Chesapeake Bay pound nets, offshore Kiptopeake, VA: Data and results of preliminary analyses

Pamlico Sound, North Carolina

Gillnets and Entangling Nets
flounder
Low profile gillnet
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary: Low profile gillnets with a panel height of six feet and no tie downs or additional floats had significantly fewer interactions with sea turtles and caught significantly less bycatch than standard gillnets. Catches of the target species (flounder) were also reduced in the low profile gillnets.
Effect on Bycatch: Reduced incidental capture of sea turtles and bycatch species
Reference:
Price, B., Van Salisbury, C., 2007 , Low-profile gillnet testing in the deep water region of Pamlico Sound, NC

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

©2026 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in